Contract Deposit Analysis

All 6 cities • Contracts over $2,000 • Generated 22 Mar 2026 from Square API (98,847 invoices across 17,533 series)

Total Contracts >$2K
2,655
$7.33M total value
Group A (>10% Deposited)
2,267
85.4% of contracts
Group B (≤10% Deposited)
388
14.6% of contracts
Collection Rate Gap
60x
Group A collects 60x more

Head-to-Head Comparison

Group A — More Than 10% Deposited

61.8%
Payment Success Rate
Contracts2,267
Contract Value$6,039,382
Total Collected$3,607,909
Outstanding$2,438,250
Collection Rate59.7%
Avg Installments Paid6.1 of 10.3
Avg Consecutive Misses2.9
Made It Past #362.7%
Made It Past #644.6%
Made It Past #1218.4%

Group B — 10% or Less Deposited

1.8%
Payment Success Rate
Contracts388
Contract Value$1,294,944
Total Collected$14,169
Outstanding$1,283,690
Collection Rate1.1%
Avg Installments Paid0.1 of 7.8
Avg Consecutive Misses6.9
Made It Past #30.0%
Made It Past #60.0%
Made It Past #120.0%

Key Insight

Contracts where the customer deposited more than 10% of the contract value collect at 61.8% success rate. Those with 10% or less deposited collect at just 1.8% — effectively dead money. 64.4% of Group B customers miss their very first installment and never pay again. The deposit amount is the single strongest predictor of whether a contract will collect.

Deposit % Breakdown

Deposit BandContractsContract ValueTotal PaidOutstandingGroup
0% (nothing paid)341$1,148,109$0$1,148,109B
1–5%7$26,729$717$26,012B
6–10%40$120,107$10,537$109,570B
11–25%452$1,162,203$203,777$958,426A
26–50%543$1,525,690$593,905$931,785A
51–75%373$1,034,316$655,708$378,608A
76–100%899$2,317,173$2,147,742$169,431A

Payment Success Rate by Installment Number

Group A (>10%)
Group B (≤10%)

First Miss Distribution

Which installment number does each group first fail to pay?

Group A — First Miss At

InstallmentCount% of Group
#12079.1%
#224810.9%
#322610.0%
#41888.3%
#51325.8%
#61305.7%
#71335.9%
#81396.1%
#91406.2%
#101356.0%
#11+1265.6%

Gradual — spread evenly across first 10 installments

Group B — First Miss At

InstallmentCount% of Group
#125064.4%
#25413.9%
#3225.7%
#4102.6%
#551.3%
#682.1%
#792.3%
#861.5%
#982.1%
#10+92.3%

Cliff — 64% gone at installment #1, 78% gone by #2

By City

CityTotalGroup A (>10%)Group A ValueGroup B (≤10%)Group B ValueB as % of City
Texas393260$600,614133$461,31133.8%
New York432351$813,32681$212,41518.8%
Nashville541469$1,310,38672$267,45113.3%
Florida678628$1,738,80750$178,7947.4%
Boston583538$1,520,03545$154,6837.7%
Chicago2821$56,2147$20,29125.0%

Texas Problem

Texas has the highest concentration of Group B contracts — 33.8% of Texas contracts over $2K have ≤10% deposited, vs 7-8% in Boston and Florida. That's $461K in essentially uncollectable contract value.

By Contract Value

Contract ValueTotalGroup AGroup BB %
$2,001 – $3,0002,0991,80029914.2%
$3,001 – $5,000498449499.8%
$5,001 – $10,00039182153.8%
$10,001+19019100.0%

High-Value Warning

Every single contract over $10K has ≤10% deposited — all 19 are Group B. And 54% of $5K-$10K contracts are Group B. The bigger the contract, the more likely it is to be uncollectable.

Installment-by-Installment Success Rate

Group A (>10%)
Group B (≤10%)
Install #Group A RateGroup A (paid/total)Group B RateGroup B (paid/total)Gap
#186.1%1,483 / 1,7232.2%6 / 269+83.8
#279.2%1,473 / 1,8592.3%7 / 311+77.0
#374.4%1,461 / 1,9632.4%8 / 328+72.0
#470.1%1,432 / 2,0441.8%6 / 334+68.3
#565.7%1,371 / 2,0871.2%4 / 327+64.5
#662.1%1,319 / 2,1242.2%7 / 313+59.9
#756.7%1,201 / 2,1180.4%1 / 270+56.3
#854.1%1,092 / 2,0200.4%1 / 224+53.6
#951.1%913 / 1,7850.6%1 / 165+50.5
#1048.4%752 / 1,5532.9%3 / 104+45.5
#1136.8%371 / 1,0070.0%0 / 70+36.8
#1233.9%267 / 7870.0%0 / 61+33.9