Share:

Lead Quality Report

09/13/2026 → 09/20/2026  ·  7 days  ·  10,680 leads in  ·  OOA: >200mi
All18.3%
Atlanta70.1%
Nashville19.0%
Dallas18.9%
Houston17.0%
Chicago16.3%
Florida15.2%
Boston14.5%
New York14.3%
By Supplier
Blue Rooms18.0%
Neil Recycled20.7%
Lead Pronto20.8%
Alan12.9%
Organic34.7%
Leads In
10,680
Usable
8,727
81.7%
Non-Usable
1,953
18.3%
OOA
730
Booked
488
Gross: 4.6%
Net Book Rate
5.6%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
8,075
Good
6,583
Bad
1,492
Good %
81.5%
406 booked · Net: 6.2%
Alan (4AB) 4AB codes only
In
1
Good
1
Bad
0
Good %
100.0%
0 booked · Net: 0.0%
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
2,067
Good
1,640
Bad
427
Good %
79.3%
47 booked · Net: 2.9%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
537
Good
503
Bad
34
Good %
93.7%
33 booked · Net: 6.6%
All Cities — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Organic 75 10 13.3% 14 18.7% 1 1.3% 9 12.0% 4 5 6.7% 26 49 34.7% 3 6.1%
Lead Pronto 1,694 43 2.5% 269 15.9% 14 0.8% 136 8.0% 119 49 2.9% 353 1,341 20.8% 73 5.4%
Neil Recycled 2,067 38 1.8% 200 9.7% 14 0.7% 48 2.3% 138 215 10.4% 427 1,640 20.7% 47 2.9%
Blue Rooms 5,133 62 1.2% 468 9.1% 146 2.8% 138 2.7% 184 420 8.2% 926 4,207 18.0% 271 6.4%
Alan 1,711 35 2.0% 150 8.8% 4 0.2% 89 5.2% 57 41 2.4% 221 1,490 12.9% 92 6.2%
All Cities — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 5 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Organic 75 Removal Duplicate 9 12.0%
Organic 75 Rejection DUPLICATE Lead 7 9.3%
Lead Pronto 1,694 Removal Duplicate 136 8.0%
Alan 1,711 Removal Duplicate 89 5.2%
Organic 75 Removal Previous Client 3 4.0%
All Cities — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 62
DO NOT CALL
24 · 39%
DUPLICATE Lead
15 · 24%
Wrong Number
12 · 19%
Out Of State
5 · 8%
Unemployed Undocumented
4 · 6%
Lead Pronto 43
DUPLICATE Lead
14 · 33%
DO NOT CALL
14 · 33%
Wrong Number
11 · 26%
Been to Us Already
2 · 5%
Out Of State
2 · 5%
Neil Recycled 38
DO NOT CALL
16 · 42%
DUPLICATE Lead
12 · 32%
Out Of State
4 · 11%
Wrong Number
3 · 8%
Too Young
1 · 3%
Alan 35
DUPLICATE Lead
10 · 29%
Wrong Number
7 · 20%
Been to Us Already
6 · 17%
DO NOT CALL
6 · 17%
Out Of State
4 · 11%
Organic 10
DUPLICATE Lead
7 · 70%
Wrong Number
1 · 10%
Been to Us Already
1 · 10%
Out Of State
1 · 10%
—
All Cities — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 468
Blocked
146 · 31%
Duplicate
138 · 29%
Pro portfolio
84 · 18%
Previous Client
43 · 9%
Inappropriate
41 · 9%
Lead Pronto 269
Duplicate
136 · 51%
Inappropriate
50 · 19%
Pro portfolio
32 · 12%
Too young/old
25 · 9%
Blocked
14 · 5%
Neil Recycled 200
Duplicate
48 · 24%
Inappropriate
44 · 22%
No Photo
25 · 13%
Previous Client
25 · 13%
Pro portfolio
25 · 13%
Alan 150
Duplicate
89 · 59%
Pro portfolio
23 · 15%
Inappropriate
16 · 11%
Previous Client
12 · 8%
Too young/old
5 · 3%
Organic 14
Duplicate
9 · 64%
Previous Client
3 · 21%
Blocked
1 · 7%
Pro portfolio
1 · 7%
—
All Cities — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 8,075 leads · 1,492 bad · 18.5% · 406 booked · Net: 6.2%
Atlanta 415 in · 291 bad · 70.1% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#AT1FX 135 33 102 24.4% 1 0.7% 10 7.4% 6 4.4% 4 98 72.6%
#ATKIDSX 280 91 189 32.5% 8 2.9% 8 184 65.7%
TOTAL 415 124 291 29.9% 1 0.2% 18 4.3% 6 1.4% 0 12 282 68.0% 0
Dallas 1,098 in · 211 bad · 19.2% · 61 booked · Net: 6.9%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#DAL3CX2F 3 1 2 33.3% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 1
#DALP2 159 102 57 64.2% 10 6.3% 40 25.2% 2 1.3% 21 13.2% 17 8 5.0% 7 6.9%
#DALFB31F 6 4 2 66.7% 2 33.3% 2 33.3%
#DAL3CX3F 7 5 2 71.4% 1 14.3% 1 1 14.3%
#DALFB32F 4 3 1 75.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0%
#DAL1FX 317 239 78 75.4% 15 4.7% 51 16.1% 18 5.7% 22 6.9% 11 14 4.4% 16 6.7%
#DALFB31M 62 50 12 80.6% 2 3.2% 10 16.1% 9 14.5% 1 7 14.0%
#DAL3CX1F 100 82 18 82.0% 6 6.0% 11 11.0% 4 4.0% 7 3 3.0% 1 1.2%
#DAL3CX1M 62 51 11 82.3% 4 6.5% 4 6.5% 1 1.6% 3 3 4.8% 5 9.8%
#DALKIDSX 292 266 26 91.1% 9 3.1% 8 2.7% 3 1.0% 5 10 3.4% 18 6.8%
#DALFB32M 27 25 2 92.6% 2 7.4% 2 7.4%
#DAL3CX2M 5 5 0 100.0%
#DALSNAP 43 43 0 100.0% 7 16.3%
#DALGX 9 9 0 100.0%
#DALFB33M 1 1 0 100.0%
#DALFB33F 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 1,098 887 211 80.8% 46 4.2% 132 12.0% 23 2.1% 63 5.7% 46 39 3.6% 61 6.9%
Nashville 580 in · 95 bad · 16.4% · 51 booked · Net: 10.5%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NASGX 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#NAFB32F 5 3 2 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0%
#NA3CX1F 26 17 9 65.4% 1 3.8% 7 26.9% 4 15.4% 3 2 7.7% 1 5.9%
#NA3CX2F 4 3 1 75.0% 1 25.0%
#NAFB31F 4 3 1 75.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0%
#NA1FX 156 120 36 76.9% 3 1.9% 31 19.9% 5 3.2% 8 5.1% 18 4 2.6% 12 10.0%
#NALP2 102 81 21 79.4% 3 2.9% 13 12.7% 8 7.8% 5 6 5.9% 5 6.2%
#NA3CX1M 12 10 2 83.3% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 1 10.0%
#NAKIDSX 209 189 20 90.4% 7 3.3% 1 0.5% 3 1.4% 3 13 6.2% 27 14.3%
#NAFB31M 24 22 2 91.7% 1 4.2% 1 4.2% 1 1 4.2% 1 4.5%
#NAFB32M 14 14 0 100.0% 2 14.3%
#NASSNAP 20 20 0 100.0% 2 10.0%
#NA3CX3F 1 1 0 100.0%
#NAFB33F 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 580 485 95 83.6% 10 1.7% 62 10.7% 6 1.0% 26 4.5% 30 28 4.8% 51 10.5%
Houston 1,008 in · 160 bad · 15.9% · 55 booked · Net: 6.5%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#HOU3CX2M 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1
#HOU3CX2F 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#HOU1FX 182 123 59 67.6% 2 1.1% 51 28.0% 18 9.9% 12 6.6% 21 9 4.9% 9 7.3%
#HOU3CX1M 32 25 7 78.1% 3 9.4% 1 3.1% 1 3.1% 1 4 12.5% 2 8.0%
#HOUFB31F 29 23 6 79.3% 1 3.4% 3 10.3% 2 6.9% 1 2 6.9%
#HOULP2 233 190 43 81.5% 6 2.6% 33 14.2% 3 1.3% 14 6.0% 16 5 2.1% 10 5.3%
#HOUGX 14 12 2 85.7% 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 1
#HOU3CX1F 40 35 5 87.5% 1 2.5% 3 7.5% 3 1 2.5% 5 14.3%
#HOUFB31M 89 79 10 88.8% 3 3.4% 5 5.6% 3 3.4% 2 2 2.2% 7 8.9%
#HOUKIDSX 327 302 25 92.4% 4 1.2% 10 3.1% 1 0.3% 3 0.9% 6 11 3.4% 19 6.3%
#HOUFB32M 24 23 1 95.8% 1 4.2% 1 4.2%
#HOUFB32F 12 12 0 100.0% 1 8.3%
#HOUFB33M 6 6 0 100.0%
#HOUSNAP 14 14 0 100.0% 2 14.3%
#HOUFB33F 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOU3CX3F 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 1,008 848 160 84.1% 19 1.9% 110 10.9% 23 2.3% 35 3.5% 52 36 3.6% 55 6.5%
Boston 848 in · 132 bad · 15.6% · 35 booked · Net: 4.9%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#BO3CX3F 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#BOFB32F 7 5 2 71.4% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 1 14.3%
#BOFB31F 11 8 3 72.7% 3 27.3% 2 18.2% 1
#BOSLP2 209 159 50 76.1% 12 5.7% 38 18.2% 3 1.4% 18 8.6% 17 8 5.0%
#BOFB31M 26 21 5 80.8% 2 7.7% 3 11.5% 2 7.7% 1 1 4.8%
#BOS1FX 295 241 54 81.7% 4 1.4% 50 16.9% 18 6.1% 17 5.8% 15 10 4.1%
#BO3CX1F 33 27 6 81.8% 6 18.2% 2 6.1% 4 2 7.4%
#BOSSNAP 25 22 3 88.0% 1 4.0% 2 8.0% 2
#BO3CX1M 32 30 2 93.8% 2 6.3% 1 3.1% 1 2 6.7%
#BOSKIDSX 185 179 6 96.8% 1 0.5% 5 2.7% 2 1.1% 3 12 6.7%
#BO3CX3M 2 2 0 100.0%
#BOFB32M 11 11 0 100.0%
#BO3CX2F 1 1 0 100.0%
#BOSGX 7 7 0 100.0%
#BOFB33M 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 848 716 132 84.4% 21 2.5% 111 13.1% 22 2.6% 45 5.3% 44 0 35 4.9%
Florida 2,257 in · 346 bad · 15.3% · 84 booked · Net: 4.4%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#FLFB31F 19 11 8 57.9% 8 42.1% 6 31.6% 2
#FL01 75 49 26 65.3% 10 13.3% 14 18.7% 1 1.3% 9 12.0% 4 5 6.7% 3 6.1%
#ORLFB32F 8 6 2 75.0% 2 25.0%
#FL3CX2F 4 3 1 75.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0%
#FL3CX3F 4 3 1 75.0% 1 25.0% 1
#ORLP2 334 258 76 77.2% 3 0.9% 50 15.0% 21 6.3% 29 26 7.8% 9 3.5%
#FLP2 192 153 39 79.7% 3 1.6% 36 18.8% 3 1.6% 20 10.4% 13 1 0.5% 6 3.9%
#FL1FX 296 242 54 81.8% 1 0.3% 53 17.9% 23 7.8% 17 5.7% 13 16 6.6%
#ORL1FX 314 258 56 82.2% 3 1.0% 49 15.6% 14 4.5% 23 7.3% 12 4 1.3% 15 5.8%
#FL3CX1F 80 67 13 83.8% 12 15.0% 2 2.5% 6 7.5% 4 1 1.3% 2 3.0%
#ORLFB31M 79 67 12 84.8% 1 1.3% 10 12.7% 8 10.1% 2 1 1.3% 4 6.0%
#FLFB31M 84 73 11 86.9% 1 1.2% 10 11.9% 7 8.3% 3 4 5.5%
#ORLSNAP 24 21 3 87.5% 2 8.3% 1 4.2% 1 1 4.8%
#FLFB32F 8 7 1 87.5% 1 12.5% 1 12.5%
#FLSNAP 10 9 1 90.0% 1 10.0% 1 10.0% 1 11.1%
#ORLGX 10 9 1 90.0% 1 10.0%
#FL3CX1M 45 41 4 91.1% 3 6.7% 1 2.2% 2 1 2.2% 2 4.9%
#ORLFB31F 17 16 1 94.1% 1 5.9% 1 5.9% 1 6.3%
#FLKIDSX 645 609 36 94.4% 3 0.5% 26 4.0% 5 0.8% 4 0.6% 17 8 1.2% 20 3.3%
#FL3CX2M 1 1 0 100.0%
#FLGX 8 8 0 100.0%
TOTAL 2,257 1,911 346 84.7% 27 1.2% 277 12.3% 49 2.2% 125 5.5% 103 50 2.2% 84 4.4%
Chicago 1,000 in · 151 bad · 15.1% · 43 booked · Net: 5.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#CHI3CX3F 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1
#CHI1FX 232 162 70 69.8% 1 0.4% 51 22.0% 17 7.3% 14 6.0% 20 19 8.2% 3 1.9%
#CHIFB31M 57 48 9 84.2% 1 1.8% 8 14.0% 7 12.3% 1 6 12.5%
#CHILP2 237 200 37 84.4% 3 1.3% 34 14.3% 23 9.7% 11 19 9.5%
#CHI3CX1F 31 27 4 87.1% 3 9.7% 1 3.2% 2 1 3.2% 1 3.7%
#CHIFB31F 24 21 3 87.5% 1 4.2% 2 8.3% 1 4.2% 1
#CHIFB32M 18 16 2 88.9% 1 5.6% 1 5.6% 1 5.6% 1 6.3%
#CHISNAP 35 32 3 91.4% 1 2.9% 2 5.7% 1 2.9% 1 2 6.3%
#CHIFB32F 12 11 1 91.7% 1 8.3% 2 18.2%
#CHIKIDSX 313 293 20 93.6% 4 1.3% 2 0.6% 2 17 5.4% 6 2.0%
#CHI3CX1M 22 21 1 95.5% 1 4.5% 2 9.5%
#CHI3CX3M 2 2 0 100.0% 1 50.0%
#CHI3CX2M 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHI3CX2F 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHIFB33F 1 1 0 100.0%
#CHIGX 9 9 0 100.0%
#CHIFB33M 2 2 0 100.0%
TOTAL 1,000 849 151 84.9% 7 0.7% 106 10.6% 18 1.8% 49 4.9% 39 40 4.0% 43 5.1%
New York 869 in · 106 bad · 12.2% · 77 booked · Net: 10.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NY1FX 287 232 55 80.8% 5 1.7% 40 13.9% 14 4.9% 10 3.5% 16 12 4.2% 14 6.0%
#NYLP2 154 131 23 85.1% 1 0.6% 22 14.3% 3 1.9% 11 7.1% 8 5 3.8%
#NY3CX1F 9 8 1 88.9% 1 11.1% 1
#NY3CX1M 9 8 1 88.9% 1 11.1%
#NYKIDSX 378 353 25 93.4% 5 1.3% 6 1.6% 1 0.3% 5 15 4.0% 58 16.4%
#NYSNAP 25 24 1 96.0% 1 4.0% 1 4.0%
#NYFB32M 2 2 0 100.0%
#NYFB31M 2 2 0 100.0%
#NY3CX2M 1 1 0 100.0%
#NY3CX2F 1 1 0 100.0%
#NYGX 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 869 763 106 87.8% 11 1.3% 70 8.1% 18 2.1% 22 2.5% 30 28 3.2% 77 10.1%
Alan (4AB)4AB codes only 1 leads · 0 bad · 0.0% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
Nashville 1 in · 0 bad · 0.0% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NA4ABR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 1 1 0 100.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 2,067 leads · 427 bad · 20.7% · 47 booked · Net: 2.9%
Nashville 211 in · 60 bad · 28.4% · 4 booked · Net: 2.6%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NAN1N 47 30 17 63.8% 2 4.3% 6 12.8% 6 13 27.7%
#NA6AB 127 89 38 70.1% 2 1.6% 12 9.4% 2 1.6% 1 0.8% 9 26 20.5% 2 2.2%
#NACMN 14 12 2 85.7% 2 14.3% 1 8.3%
#NA5AB 23 20 3 87.0% 1 4.3% 1 2 8.7% 1 5.0%
TOTAL 211 151 60 71.6% 4 1.9% 19 9.0% 2 0.9% 1 0.5% 16 43 20.4% 4 2.6%
Chicago 290 in · 66 bad · 22.8% · 7 booked · Net: 3.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#CHI6AB 166 122 44 73.5% 1 0.6% 27 16.3% 9 5.4% 18 18 10.8% 2 1.6%
#CHICMN 25 20 5 80.0% 2 8.0% 1 4.0% 1 3 12.0% 3 15.0%
#CHIN1N 71 57 14 80.3% 6 8.5% 2 2.8% 1 1.4% 3 8 11.3% 1 1.8%
#CHI5AB 28 25 3 89.3% 2 7.1% 1 3.6% 1 1 3.6% 1 4.0%
TOTAL 290 224 66 77.2% 1 0.3% 37 12.8% 2 0.7% 12 4.1% 23 30 10.3% 7 3.1%
Houston 306 in · 65 bad · 21.2% · 6 booked · Net: 2.5%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#HOU6AB 170 129 41 75.9% 2 1.2% 19 11.2% 1 0.6% 4 2.4% 14 22 12.9% 3 2.3%
#HOU5AB 43 34 9 79.1% 1 2.3% 5 11.6% 2 4.7% 3 3 7.0% 1 2.9%
#HOUN1N 66 54 12 81.8% 6 9.1% 2 3.0% 4 7 10.6% 1 1.9%
#HOUCMN 27 24 3 88.9% 1 3.7% 3 11.1% 1 4.2%
TOTAL 306 241 65 78.8% 4 1.3% 30 9.8% 1 0.3% 8 2.6% 21 35 11.4% 6 2.5%
Dallas 229 in · 48 bad · 21.0% · 6 booked · Net: 3.3%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#DAL6AB 133 95 38 71.4% 1 0.8% 24 18.0% 2 1.5% 3 2.3% 19 15 11.3% 2 2.1%
#DALN1N 65 57 8 87.7% 5 7.7% 1 1.5% 4 3 4.6% 1 1.8%
#DALCMN 12 11 1 91.7% 1 8.3%
#DAL5AB 19 18 1 94.7% 1 5.3% 3 16.7%
TOTAL 229 181 48 79.0% 1 0.4% 29 12.7% 2 0.9% 4 1.7% 23 20 8.7% 6 3.3%
New York 390 in · 81 bad · 20.8% · 13 booked · Net: 4.2%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NYCMN 44 34 10 77.3% 4 9.1% 7 15.9% 2 5.9%
#NYN1N 81 63 18 77.8% 1 1.2% 9 11.1% 1 1.2% 1 1.2% 7 12 14.8% 5 7.9%
#NY6AB 216 170 46 78.7% 1 0.5% 21 9.7% 2 0.9% 10 4.6% 9 28 13.0% 1 0.6%
#NY5AB 49 42 7 85.7% 4 8.2% 1 2.0% 3 3 6.1% 5 11.9%
TOTAL 390 309 81 79.2% 6 1.5% 34 8.7% 3 0.8% 12 3.1% 19 50 12.8% 13 4.2%
Florida 436 in · 81 bad · 18.6% · 8 booked · Net: 2.3%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#ORLCMN 12 9 3 75.0% 2 16.7% 1 8.3%
#FLN1N 54 41 13 75.9% 5 9.3% 8 14.8% 1 1.9% 2 3.7% 5 1 1.9% 2 4.9%
#FL6AB 158 125 33 79.1% 6 3.8% 18 11.4% 1 0.6% 3 1.9% 14 9 5.7%
#ORL5AB 10 8 2 80.0% 1 10.0% 1 1 10.0%
#ORL6AB 86 70 16 81.4% 9 10.5% 2 2.3% 2 2.3% 5 8 9.3% 4 5.7%
#ORLN1N 57 47 10 82.5% 1 1.8% 5 8.8% 2 3.5% 3 5 8.8%
#FL5AB 38 35 3 92.1% 2 5.3% 1 2.6%
#FLCMN 21 20 1 95.2% 1 4.8% 2 10.0%
TOTAL 436 355 81 81.4% 17 3.9% 41 9.4% 4 0.9% 9 2.1% 28 26 6.0% 8 2.3%
Boston 205 in · 26 bad · 12.7% · 3 booked · Net: 1.7%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#BOS5AB 13 8 5 61.5% 1 7.7% 2 15.4% 2 2 15.4%
#BOSCMN 15 11 4 73.3% 4 26.7%
#BOSN1N 55 49 6 89.1% 4 7.3% 1 1.8% 3 2 3.6% 1 2.0%
#BOS6AB 122 111 11 91.0% 4 3.3% 1 0.8% 3 7 5.7% 2 1.8%
TOTAL 205 179 26 87.3% 5 2.4% 10 4.9% 0 2 1.0% 8 11 5.4% 3 1.7%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 537 leads · 34 bad · 6.3% · 33 booked · Net: 6.6%
Houston 52 in · 7 bad · 13.5% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#HOUGXR 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#HOUFB32FR 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#HOUFB32MR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#HOU3CX1FR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#HOULP2R 11 9 2 81.8% 1 9.1% 1 9.1% 1 1 9.1%
#HOU1FXR 15 14 1 93.3% 1 6.7%
#HOUKXR 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOUFB31MR 4 4 0 100.0%
#HOUFB31FR 2 2 0 100.0%
#HOUKIDSXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#HOUSNAPR 3 3 0 100.0%
#HOU3CX2MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOUFB33FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOU3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 52 45 7 86.5% 2 3.8% 1 1.9% 0 0 1 5 9.6% 0
Nashville 55 in · 6 bad · 10.9% · 5 booked · Net: 10.2%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NADXR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3% 1
#NA3CX1MR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#NALP2R 16 13 3 81.3% 1 6.3% 1 6.3% 1 1 6.3% 1 7.7%
#NA1FXR 11 10 1 90.9% 1 9.1% 1 2 20.0%
#NASGXR 4 4 0 100.0%
#NAKIDSXR 5 5 0 100.0% 2 40.0%
#NA3CX1FR 3 3 0 100.0%
#NAFB33FR 2 2 0 100.0%
#NAFB32MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#NAFB32FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NAFB31MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NAFB33MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#NASSNAPR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NAFB31FR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 55 49 6 89.1% 1 1.8% 3 5.5% 0 0 3 2 3.6% 5 10.2%
Chicago 69 in · 5 bad · 7.2% · 2 booked · Net: 3.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#CHIKIDSXR 16 13 3 81.3% 2 12.5% 1 6.3%
#CHI1FXR 30 28 2 93.3% 1 3.3% 1 1 3.3% 2 7.1%
#CHISNAPR 9 9 0 100.0%
#CHIFB31MR 3 3 0 100.0%
#CHIFB32MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHIFB33FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#CHI3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#CHIDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#CHIGXR 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHI3CX1FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#CHI12FR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 69 64 5 92.8% 2 2.9% 1 1.4% 0 0 1 2 2.9% 2 3.1%
Dallas 67 in · 4 bad · 6.0% · 8 booked · Net: 12.7%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#DALFB31FR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3% 1 33.3%
#DAL1FXR 14 12 2 85.7% 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 1 8.3%
#DALKIDSXR 22 21 1 95.5% 1 4.5% 1 4 19.0%
#DALDXR 1 1 0 100.0%
#DALSNAPR 5 5 0 100.0%
#DAL3CX2FR 2 2 0 100.0%
#DALFB31MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#DALP2R 7 7 0 100.0%
#DAL3CX1FR 5 5 0 100.0% 1 20.0%
#DAL3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0% 1 100.0%
#DALFB32MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#DALGXR 3 3 0 100.0% 1 33.3%
TOTAL 67 63 4 94.0% 0 3 4.5% 0 2 3.0% 1 1 1.5% 8 12.7%
Florida 176 in · 8 bad · 4.5% · 12 booked · Net: 7.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#FLGXR 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0%
#FLFB31FR 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#ORLP2R 19 17 2 89.5% 1 5.3% 1 1 5.3% 3 17.6%
#FLFB31MR 11 10 1 90.9% 1 9.1% 1 10.0%
#ORLFB31MR 15 14 1 93.3% 1 6.7%
#ORL1FXR 29 28 1 96.6% 1 3.4% 1 3.4% 2 7.1%
#FLKIDSXR 35 34 1 97.1% 1 2.9% 1 2.9% 3 8.8%
#FLDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#ORLGXR 4 4 0 100.0%
#ORL4IG31MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#FL1FXR 35 35 0 100.0% 3 8.6%
#ORLDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#FL01R 2 2 0 100.0%
#FL3CX3FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLSNAPR 2 2 0 100.0%
#FL3CX1FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#FL4IG32FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#FL3CX1MR 3 3 0 100.0%
#ORL4IG31FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#FLSNAPR 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLFB31FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLFB32FR 3 3 0 100.0%
#FLFB32FR 2 2 0 100.0%
TOTAL 176 168 8 95.5% 3 1.7% 3 1.7% 0 2 1.1% 1 2 1.1% 12 7.1%
Boston 53 in · 2 bad · 3.8% · 2 booked · Net: 3.9%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#BO3CX2MR 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1
#BO3CX1FR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 50.0%
#BOS1FXR 22 22 0 100.0%
#BOSLP2R 11 11 0 100.0%
#BO3CX1MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#BOSKIDSXR 5 5 0 100.0% 1 20.0%
#BOSSNAPR 5 5 0 100.0%
#BOSDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#BOSPXR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 53 51 2 96.2% 0 2 3.8% 0 1 1.9% 1 0 2 3.9%
New York 65 in · 2 bad · 3.1% · 4 booked · Net: 6.3%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NYKIDSXR 40 38 2 95.0% 2 5.0% 2 5.0% 2 5.3%
#NYLP2R 10 10 0 100.0%
#NY3CX1FR 3 3 0 100.0%
#NYKPXR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NYSNAPR 8 8 0 100.0% 1 12.5%
#NY3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NY1FXR 2 2 0 100.0% 1 50.0%
TOTAL 65 63 2 96.9% 0 2 3.1% 0 2 3.1% 0 0 4 6.3%
All Cities — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
DO NOT CALL6031.9%
DUPLICATE Lead5830.9%
Wrong Number3418.1%
Out Of State168.5%
Been to Us Already115.9%
Unemployed Undocumented73.7%
Too Young10.5%
No English Spoken10.5%
All Cities — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate42038.1%
Blocked17916.3%
Pro portfolio16515.0%
Inappropriate15113.7%
Previous Client928.4%
Too young/old595.4%
No Photo252.3%
Not Suitable80.7%
Spam20.2%
City Comparison
CityInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Atlanta 415 1 0.2% 18 4.3% 6 1.4% 0 0.0% 12 282 68.0% 291 124 70.1% 0
Nashville 847 15 1.8% 84 9.9% 8 0.9% 27 3.2% 49 73 8.6% 161 686 19.0% 60 8.7%
Dallas 1,394 47 3.4% 164 11.8% 25 1.8% 69 4.9% 70 60 4.3% 263 1,131 18.9% 75 6.6%
Houston 1,366 25 1.8% 141 10.3% 24 1.8% 43 3.1% 74 76 5.6% 232 1,134 17.0% 61 5.4%
Chicago 1,359 10 0.7% 144 10.6% 20 1.5% 61 4.5% 63 72 5.3% 222 1,137 16.3% 52 4.6%
Florida 2,869 47 1.6% 321 11.2% 53 1.8% 136 4.7% 132 78 2.7% 435 2,434 15.2% 104 4.3%
Boston 1,106 26 2.4% 123 11.1% 22 2.0% 48 4.3% 53 11 1.0% 160 946 14.5% 40 4.2%
New York 1,324 17 1.3% 106 8.0% 21 1.6% 36 2.7% 49 78 5.9% 189 1,135 14.3% 94 8.3%
Leads In
415
Usable
124
29.9%
Non-Usable
291
70.1%
OOA
282
Booked
0
Gross: 0.0%
Net Book Rate
0.0%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
415
Good
124
Bad
291
Good %
29.9%
0 booked · Net: 0.0%
Alan (4AB)
—
Neil Recycled
—
Retargeted (R)
—
Atlanta — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Blue Rooms 415 1 0.2% 18 4.3% 6 1.4% 0 12 282 68.0% 291 124 70.1% 0
Atlanta — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 1
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 100%
————
Atlanta — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 18
Pro portfolio
9 · 50%
Blocked
6 · 33%
Inappropriate
3 · 17%
——
Atlanta — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 415 leads · 291 bad · 70.1% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#AT1FX 135 33 102 24.4% 1 0.7% 10 7.4% 6 4.4% 4 98 72.6%
#ATKIDSX 280 91 189 32.5% 8 2.9% 8 184 65.7%
TOTAL 415 124 291 29.9% 1 0.2% 18 4.3% 6 1.4% 0 12 282 68.0% 0
Atlanta — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
DUPLICATE Lead1100.0%
Atlanta — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Pro portfolio950.0%
Blocked633.3%
Inappropriate316.7%
Leads In
847
Usable
686
81.0%
Non-Usable
161
19.0%
OOA
73
Booked
60
Gross: 7.1%
Net Book Rate
8.7%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
580
Good
485
Bad
95
Good %
83.6%
51 booked · Net: 10.5%
Alan (4AB) 4AB codes only
In
1
Good
1
Bad
0
Good %
100.0%
0 booked · Net: 0.0%
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
211
Good
151
Bad
60
Good %
71.6%
4 booked · Net: 2.6%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
55
Good
49
Bad
6
Good %
89.1%
5 booked · Net: 10.2%
Nashville — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Neil Recycled 211 4 1.9% 19 9.0% 2 0.9% 1 0.5% 16 43 20.4% 60 151 28.4% 4 2.6%
Lead Pronto 118 4 3.4% 14 11.9% 0 8 6.8% 6 7 5.9% 24 94 20.3% 6 6.4%
Alan 130 4 3.1% 13 10.0% 0 7 5.4% 6 5 3.8% 20 110 15.4% 9 8.2%
Blue Rooms 388 3 0.8% 38 9.8% 6 1.5% 11 2.8% 21 18 4.6% 57 331 14.7% 41 12.4%
Nashville — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 3 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Lead Pronto 118 Removal Duplicate 8 6.8%
Alan 130 Removal Duplicate 7 5.4%
Lead Pronto 118 Removal Inappropriate 5 4.2%
Nashville — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Alan 4
Wrong Number
2 · 50%
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 25%
Been to Us Already
1 · 25%
——
Neil Recycled 4
Out Of State
2 · 50%
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 25%
Wrong Number
1 · 25%
——
Lead Pronto 4
Wrong Number
2 · 50%
Out Of State
1 · 25%
DO NOT CALL
1 · 25%
——
Blue Rooms 3
Unemployed Undocumented
2 · 67%
Been to Us Already
1 · 33%
———
Nashville — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 38
Duplicate
11 · 29%
Previous Client
7 · 18%
Inappropriate
6 · 16%
Pro portfolio
6 · 16%
Blocked
6 · 16%
Neil Recycled 19
Inappropriate
6 · 32%
Pro portfolio
4 · 21%
Previous Client
3 · 16%
Too young/old
2 · 11%
Blocked
2 · 11%
Lead Pronto 14
Duplicate
8 · 57%
Inappropriate
5 · 36%
Pro portfolio
1 · 7%
——
Alan 13
Duplicate
7 · 54%
Pro portfolio
3 · 23%
Inappropriate
2 · 15%
Too young/old
1 · 8%
—
Nashville — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 580 leads · 95 bad · 16.4% · 51 booked · Net: 10.5%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NASGX 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#NAFB32F 5 3 2 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0%
#NA3CX1F 26 17 9 65.4% 1 3.8% 7 26.9% 4 15.4% 3 2 7.7% 1 5.9%
#NA3CX2F 4 3 1 75.0% 1 25.0%
#NAFB31F 4 3 1 75.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0%
#NA1FX 156 120 36 76.9% 3 1.9% 31 19.9% 5 3.2% 8 5.1% 18 4 2.6% 12 10.0%
#NALP2 102 81 21 79.4% 3 2.9% 13 12.7% 8 7.8% 5 6 5.9% 5 6.2%
#NA3CX1M 12 10 2 83.3% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 1 10.0%
#NAKIDSX 209 189 20 90.4% 7 3.3% 1 0.5% 3 1.4% 3 13 6.2% 27 14.3%
#NAFB31M 24 22 2 91.7% 1 4.2% 1 4.2% 1 1 4.2% 1 4.5%
#NAFB32M 14 14 0 100.0% 2 14.3%
#NASSNAP 20 20 0 100.0% 2 10.0%
#NA3CX3F 1 1 0 100.0%
#NAFB33F 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 580 485 95 83.6% 10 1.7% 62 10.7% 6 1.0% 26 4.5% 30 28 4.8% 51 10.5%
Alan (4AB)4AB codes only 1 leads · 0 bad · 0.0% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NA4ABR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 1 1 0 100.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 211 leads · 60 bad · 28.4% · 4 booked · Net: 2.6%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NAN1N 47 30 17 63.8% 2 4.3% 6 12.8% 6 13 27.7%
#NA6AB 127 89 38 70.1% 2 1.6% 12 9.4% 2 1.6% 1 0.8% 9 26 20.5% 2 2.2%
#NACMN 14 12 2 85.7% 2 14.3% 1 8.3%
#NA5AB 23 20 3 87.0% 1 4.3% 1 2 8.7% 1 5.0%
TOTAL 211 151 60 71.6% 4 1.9% 19 9.0% 2 0.9% 1 0.5% 16 43 20.4% 4 2.6%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 55 leads · 6 bad · 10.9% · 5 booked · Net: 10.2%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NADXR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3% 1
#NA3CX1MR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#NALP2R 16 13 3 81.3% 1 6.3% 1 6.3% 1 1 6.3% 1 7.7%
#NA1FXR 11 10 1 90.9% 1 9.1% 1 2 20.0%
#NASGXR 4 4 0 100.0%
#NAKIDSXR 5 5 0 100.0% 2 40.0%
#NA3CX1FR 3 3 0 100.0%
#NAFB33FR 2 2 0 100.0%
#NAFB32MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#NAFB32FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NAFB31MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NAFB33MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#NASSNAPR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NAFB31FR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 55 49 6 89.1% 1 1.8% 3 5.5% 0 0 3 2 3.6% 5 10.2%
Nashville — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Wrong Number533.3%
Out Of State320.0%
DUPLICATE Lead213.3%
Been to Us Already213.3%
Unemployed Undocumented213.3%
DO NOT CALL16.7%
Nashville — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate2732.1%
Inappropriate1922.6%
Pro portfolio1416.7%
Previous Client1011.9%
Blocked89.5%
Too young/old56.0%
No Photo11.2%
Leads In
1,394
Usable
1,131
81.1%
Non-Usable
263
18.9%
OOA
60
Booked
75
Gross: 5.4%
Net Book Rate
6.6%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
1,098
Good
887
Bad
211
Good %
80.8%
61 booked · Net: 6.9%
Alan (4AB)
—
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
229
Good
181
Bad
48
Good %
79.0%
6 booked · Net: 3.3%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
67
Good
63
Bad
4
Good %
94.0%
8 booked · Net: 12.7%
Dallas — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Lead Pronto 166 10 6.0% 40 24.1% 2 1.2% 21 12.7% 17 8 4.8% 57 109 34.3% 7 6.4%
Neil Recycled 229 1 0.4% 29 12.7% 2 0.9% 4 1.7% 23 20 8.7% 48 181 21.0% 6 3.3%
Alan 333 12 3.6% 36 10.8% 0 22 6.6% 14 8 2.4% 54 279 16.2% 21 7.5%
Blue Rooms 666 24 3.6% 59 8.9% 21 3.2% 22 3.3% 16 24 3.6% 104 562 15.6% 41 7.3%
Dallas — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 6 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Lead Pronto 166 Removal Duplicate 21 12.7%
Alan 333 Removal Duplicate 22 6.6%
Lead Pronto 166 Removal Inappropriate 10 6.0%
Blue Rooms 666 Removal Duplicate 22 3.3%
Blue Rooms 666 Removal Blocked 21 3.2%
Lead Pronto 166 Rejection DO NOT CALL 5 3.0%
Dallas — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 24
DO NOT CALL
16 · 67%
DUPLICATE Lead
4 · 17%
Out Of State
3 · 13%
Wrong Number
1 · 4%
—
Alan 12
Out Of State
4 · 33%
DUPLICATE Lead
3 · 25%
Unemployed Undocumented
2 · 17%
Been to Us Already
2 · 17%
DO NOT CALL
1 · 8%
Lead Pronto 10
DO NOT CALL
5 · 50%
DUPLICATE Lead
3 · 30%
Wrong Number
2 · 20%
——
Neil Recycled 1
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 100%
————
Dallas — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 59
Duplicate
22 · 37%
Blocked
21 · 36%
Inappropriate
8 · 14%
Pro portfolio
6 · 10%
Too young/old
2 · 3%
Lead Pronto 40
Duplicate
21 · 53%
Inappropriate
10 · 25%
Pro portfolio
3 · 8%
Too young/old
3 · 8%
Blocked
2 · 5%
Alan 36
Duplicate
22 · 61%
Pro portfolio
6 · 17%
Previous Client
3 · 8%
Too young/old
3 · 8%
Inappropriate
2 · 6%
Neil Recycled 29
Too young/old
6 · 21%
Pro portfolio
5 · 17%
Inappropriate
5 · 17%
Duplicate
4 · 14%
Previous Client
3 · 10%
Dallas — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 1,098 leads · 211 bad · 19.2% · 61 booked · Net: 6.9%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#DAL3CX2F 3 1 2 33.3% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 1
#DALP2 159 102 57 64.2% 10 6.3% 40 25.2% 2 1.3% 21 13.2% 17 8 5.0% 7 6.9%
#DALFB31F 6 4 2 66.7% 2 33.3% 2 33.3%
#DAL3CX3F 7 5 2 71.4% 1 14.3% 1 1 14.3%
#DALFB32F 4 3 1 75.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0%
#DAL1FX 317 239 78 75.4% 15 4.7% 51 16.1% 18 5.7% 22 6.9% 11 14 4.4% 16 6.7%
#DALFB31M 62 50 12 80.6% 2 3.2% 10 16.1% 9 14.5% 1 7 14.0%
#DAL3CX1F 100 82 18 82.0% 6 6.0% 11 11.0% 4 4.0% 7 3 3.0% 1 1.2%
#DAL3CX1M 62 51 11 82.3% 4 6.5% 4 6.5% 1 1.6% 3 3 4.8% 5 9.8%
#DALKIDSX 292 266 26 91.1% 9 3.1% 8 2.7% 3 1.0% 5 10 3.4% 18 6.8%
#DALFB32M 27 25 2 92.6% 2 7.4% 2 7.4%
#DAL3CX2M 5 5 0 100.0%
#DALSNAP 43 43 0 100.0% 7 16.3%
#DALGX 9 9 0 100.0%
#DALFB33M 1 1 0 100.0%
#DALFB33F 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 1,098 887 211 80.8% 46 4.2% 132 12.0% 23 2.1% 63 5.7% 46 39 3.6% 61 6.9%
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 229 leads · 48 bad · 21.0% · 6 booked · Net: 3.3%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#DAL6AB 133 95 38 71.4% 1 0.8% 24 18.0% 2 1.5% 3 2.3% 19 15 11.3% 2 2.1%
#DALN1N 65 57 8 87.7% 5 7.7% 1 1.5% 4 3 4.6% 1 1.8%
#DALCMN 12 11 1 91.7% 1 8.3%
#DAL5AB 19 18 1 94.7% 1 5.3% 3 16.7%
TOTAL 229 181 48 79.0% 1 0.4% 29 12.7% 2 0.9% 4 1.7% 23 20 8.7% 6 3.3%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 67 leads · 4 bad · 6.0% · 8 booked · Net: 12.7%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#DALFB31FR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3% 1 33.3%
#DAL1FXR 14 12 2 85.7% 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 1 8.3%
#DALKIDSXR 22 21 1 95.5% 1 4.5% 1 4 19.0%
#DALDXR 1 1 0 100.0%
#DALSNAPR 5 5 0 100.0%
#DAL3CX2FR 2 2 0 100.0%
#DALFB31MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#DALP2R 7 7 0 100.0%
#DAL3CX1FR 5 5 0 100.0% 1 20.0%
#DAL3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0% 1 100.0%
#DALFB32MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#DALGXR 3 3 0 100.0% 1 33.3%
TOTAL 67 63 4 94.0% 0 3 4.5% 0 2 3.0% 1 1 1.5% 8 12.7%
Dallas — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
DO NOT CALL2246.8%
DUPLICATE Lead1123.4%
Out Of State714.9%
Wrong Number36.4%
Unemployed Undocumented24.3%
Been to Us Already24.3%
Dallas — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate6942.1%
Inappropriate2515.2%
Blocked2515.2%
Pro portfolio2012.2%
Too young/old148.5%
Previous Client74.3%
Not Suitable21.2%
No Photo21.2%
Leads In
1,366
Usable
1,134
83.0%
Non-Usable
232
17.0%
OOA
76
Booked
61
Gross: 4.5%
Net Book Rate
5.4%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
1,008
Good
848
Bad
160
Good %
84.1%
55 booked · Net: 6.5%
Alan (4AB)
—
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
306
Good
241
Bad
65
Good %
78.8%
6 booked · Net: 2.5%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
52
Good
45
Bad
7
Good %
86.5%
0 booked · Net: 0.0%
Houston — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Neil Recycled 306 4 1.3% 30 9.8% 1 0.3% 8 2.6% 21 35 11.4% 65 241 21.2% 6 2.5%
Lead Pronto 244 7 2.9% 34 13.9% 3 1.2% 14 5.7% 17 6 2.5% 45 199 18.4% 10 5.0%
Blue Rooms 540 7 1.3% 62 11.5% 19 3.5% 15 2.8% 28 20 3.7% 86 454 15.9% 30 6.6%
Alan 276 7 2.5% 15 5.4% 1 0.4% 6 2.2% 8 15 5.4% 36 240 13.0% 15 6.3%
Houston — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 3 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Lead Pronto 244 Removal Duplicate 14 5.7%
Blue Rooms 540 Removal Blocked 19 3.5%
Lead Pronto 244 Removal Inappropriate 8 3.3%
Houston — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Alan 7
Wrong Number
3 · 43%
DUPLICATE Lead
2 · 29%
DO NOT CALL
2 · 29%
——
Blue Rooms 7
Wrong Number
5 · 71%
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 14%
DO NOT CALL
1 · 14%
——
Lead Pronto 7
Wrong Number
3 · 43%
DO NOT CALL
2 · 29%
Been to Us Already
1 · 14%
Out Of State
1 · 14%
—
Neil Recycled 4
Out Of State
2 · 50%
Wrong Number
1 · 25%
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 25%
——
Houston — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 62
Blocked
19 · 31%
Duplicate
15 · 24%
Pro portfolio
10 · 16%
Inappropriate
9 · 15%
Previous Client
8 · 13%
Lead Pronto 34
Duplicate
14 · 41%
Inappropriate
8 · 24%
Pro portfolio
7 · 21%
Blocked
3 · 9%
Too young/old
2 · 6%
Neil Recycled 30
Duplicate
8 · 27%
Pro portfolio
6 · 20%
Inappropriate
6 · 20%
Previous Client
4 · 13%
Too young/old
3 · 10%
Alan 15
Pro portfolio
6 · 40%
Duplicate
6 · 40%
Inappropriate
1 · 7%
Blocked
1 · 7%
Previous Client
1 · 7%
Houston — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 1,008 leads · 160 bad · 15.9% · 55 booked · Net: 6.5%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#HOU3CX2M 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1
#HOU3CX2F 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#HOU1FX 182 123 59 67.6% 2 1.1% 51 28.0% 18 9.9% 12 6.6% 21 9 4.9% 9 7.3%
#HOU3CX1M 32 25 7 78.1% 3 9.4% 1 3.1% 1 3.1% 1 4 12.5% 2 8.0%
#HOUFB31F 29 23 6 79.3% 1 3.4% 3 10.3% 2 6.9% 1 2 6.9%
#HOULP2 233 190 43 81.5% 6 2.6% 33 14.2% 3 1.3% 14 6.0% 16 5 2.1% 10 5.3%
#HOUGX 14 12 2 85.7% 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 1
#HOU3CX1F 40 35 5 87.5% 1 2.5% 3 7.5% 3 1 2.5% 5 14.3%
#HOUFB31M 89 79 10 88.8% 3 3.4% 5 5.6% 3 3.4% 2 2 2.2% 7 8.9%
#HOUKIDSX 327 302 25 92.4% 4 1.2% 10 3.1% 1 0.3% 3 0.9% 6 11 3.4% 19 6.3%
#HOUFB32M 24 23 1 95.8% 1 4.2% 1 4.2%
#HOUFB32F 12 12 0 100.0% 1 8.3%
#HOUFB33M 6 6 0 100.0%
#HOUSNAP 14 14 0 100.0% 2 14.3%
#HOUFB33F 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOU3CX3F 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 1,008 848 160 84.1% 19 1.9% 110 10.9% 23 2.3% 35 3.5% 52 36 3.6% 55 6.5%
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 306 leads · 65 bad · 21.2% · 6 booked · Net: 2.5%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#HOU6AB 170 129 41 75.9% 2 1.2% 19 11.2% 1 0.6% 4 2.4% 14 22 12.9% 3 2.3%
#HOU5AB 43 34 9 79.1% 1 2.3% 5 11.6% 2 4.7% 3 3 7.0% 1 2.9%
#HOUN1N 66 54 12 81.8% 6 9.1% 2 3.0% 4 7 10.6% 1 1.9%
#HOUCMN 27 24 3 88.9% 1 3.7% 3 11.1% 1 4.2%
TOTAL 306 241 65 78.8% 4 1.3% 30 9.8% 1 0.3% 8 2.6% 21 35 11.4% 6 2.5%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 52 leads · 7 bad · 13.5% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#HOUGXR 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#HOUFB32FR 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#HOUFB32MR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#HOU3CX1FR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#HOULP2R 11 9 2 81.8% 1 9.1% 1 9.1% 1 1 9.1%
#HOU1FXR 15 14 1 93.3% 1 6.7%
#HOUKXR 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOUFB31MR 4 4 0 100.0%
#HOUFB31FR 2 2 0 100.0%
#HOUKIDSXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#HOUSNAPR 3 3 0 100.0%
#HOU3CX2MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOUFB33FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOU3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 52 45 7 86.5% 2 3.8% 1 1.9% 0 0 1 5 9.6% 0
Houston — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Wrong Number1248.0%
DO NOT CALL520.0%
DUPLICATE Lead416.0%
Out Of State312.0%
Been to Us Already14.0%
Houston — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate4330.5%
Pro portfolio2920.6%
Inappropriate2417.0%
Blocked2417.0%
Previous Client139.2%
Too young/old64.3%
No Photo21.4%
Leads In
1,359
Usable
1,137
83.7%
Non-Usable
222
16.3%
OOA
72
Booked
52
Gross: 3.8%
Net Book Rate
4.6%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
1,000
Good
849
Bad
151
Good %
84.9%
43 booked · Net: 5.1%
Alan (4AB)
—
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
290
Good
224
Bad
66
Good %
77.2%
7 booked · Net: 3.1%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
69
Good
64
Bad
5
Good %
92.8%
2 booked · Net: 3.1%
Chicago — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Neil Recycled 290 1 0.3% 37 12.8% 2 0.7% 12 4.1% 23 30 10.3% 66 224 22.8% 7 3.1%
Lead Pronto 237 3 1.3% 34 14.3% 0 23 9.7% 11 0 37 200 15.6% 19 9.5%
Blue Rooms 598 2 0.3% 57 9.5% 18 3.0% 16 2.7% 23 36 6.0% 93 505 15.6% 11 2.2%
Alan 234 4 1.7% 16 6.8% 0 10 4.3% 6 6 2.6% 26 208 11.1% 15 7.2%
Chicago — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 5 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Lead Pronto 237 Removal Duplicate 23 9.7%
Alan 234 Removal Duplicate 10 4.3%
Neil Recycled 290 Removal Duplicate 12 4.1%
Neil Recycled 290 Removal No Photo 9 3.1%
Blue Rooms 598 Removal Blocked 18 3.0%
Chicago — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Alan 4
DO NOT CALL
2 · 50%
DUPLICATE Lead
2 · 50%
———
Lead Pronto 3
DUPLICATE Lead
3 · 100%
————
Blue Rooms 2
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 50%
Unemployed Undocumented
1 · 50%
———
Neil Recycled 1
Been to Us Already
1 · 100%
————
Chicago — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 57
Blocked
18 · 32%
Duplicate
16 · 28%
Previous Client
8 · 14%
Pro portfolio
6 · 11%
Inappropriate
6 · 11%
Neil Recycled 37
Duplicate
12 · 32%
No Photo
9 · 24%
Inappropriate
6 · 16%
Pro portfolio
4 · 11%
Previous Client
3 · 8%
Lead Pronto 34
Duplicate
23 · 68%
Pro portfolio
6 · 18%
Inappropriate
3 · 9%
Previous Client
2 · 6%
—
Alan 16
Duplicate
10 · 63%
Previous Client
3 · 19%
Inappropriate
2 · 13%
Pro portfolio
1 · 6%
—
Chicago — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 1,000 leads · 151 bad · 15.1% · 43 booked · Net: 5.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#CHI3CX3F 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1
#CHI1FX 232 162 70 69.8% 1 0.4% 51 22.0% 17 7.3% 14 6.0% 20 19 8.2% 3 1.9%
#CHIFB31M 57 48 9 84.2% 1 1.8% 8 14.0% 7 12.3% 1 6 12.5%
#CHILP2 237 200 37 84.4% 3 1.3% 34 14.3% 23 9.7% 11 19 9.5%
#CHI3CX1F 31 27 4 87.1% 3 9.7% 1 3.2% 2 1 3.2% 1 3.7%
#CHIFB31F 24 21 3 87.5% 1 4.2% 2 8.3% 1 4.2% 1
#CHIFB32M 18 16 2 88.9% 1 5.6% 1 5.6% 1 5.6% 1 6.3%
#CHISNAP 35 32 3 91.4% 1 2.9% 2 5.7% 1 2.9% 1 2 6.3%
#CHIFB32F 12 11 1 91.7% 1 8.3% 2 18.2%
#CHIKIDSX 313 293 20 93.6% 4 1.3% 2 0.6% 2 17 5.4% 6 2.0%
#CHI3CX1M 22 21 1 95.5% 1 4.5% 2 9.5%
#CHI3CX3M 2 2 0 100.0% 1 50.0%
#CHI3CX2M 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHI3CX2F 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHIFB33F 1 1 0 100.0%
#CHIGX 9 9 0 100.0%
#CHIFB33M 2 2 0 100.0%
TOTAL 1,000 849 151 84.9% 7 0.7% 106 10.6% 18 1.8% 49 4.9% 39 40 4.0% 43 5.1%
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 290 leads · 66 bad · 22.8% · 7 booked · Net: 3.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#CHI6AB 166 122 44 73.5% 1 0.6% 27 16.3% 9 5.4% 18 18 10.8% 2 1.6%
#CHICMN 25 20 5 80.0% 2 8.0% 1 4.0% 1 3 12.0% 3 15.0%
#CHIN1N 71 57 14 80.3% 6 8.5% 2 2.8% 1 1.4% 3 8 11.3% 1 1.8%
#CHI5AB 28 25 3 89.3% 2 7.1% 1 3.6% 1 1 3.6% 1 4.0%
TOTAL 290 224 66 77.2% 1 0.3% 37 12.8% 2 0.7% 12 4.1% 23 30 10.3% 7 3.1%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 69 leads · 5 bad · 7.2% · 2 booked · Net: 3.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#CHIKIDSXR 16 13 3 81.3% 2 12.5% 1 6.3%
#CHI1FXR 30 28 2 93.3% 1 3.3% 1 1 3.3% 2 7.1%
#CHISNAPR 9 9 0 100.0%
#CHIFB31MR 3 3 0 100.0%
#CHIFB32MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHIFB33FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#CHI3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#CHIDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#CHIGXR 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHI3CX1FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#CHI12FR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 69 64 5 92.8% 2 2.9% 1 1.4% 0 0 1 2 2.9% 2 3.1%
Chicago — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
DUPLICATE Lead660.0%
DO NOT CALL220.0%
Been to Us Already110.0%
Unemployed Undocumented110.0%
Chicago — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate6142.4%
Blocked2013.9%
Inappropriate1711.8%
Pro portfolio1711.8%
Previous Client1611.1%
No Photo96.3%
Too young/old32.1%
Spam10.7%
Leads In
2,869
Usable
2,434
84.8%
Non-Usable
435
15.2%
OOA
78
Booked
104
Gross: 3.6%
Net Book Rate
4.3%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
2,257
Good
1,911
Bad
346
Good %
84.7%
84 booked · Net: 4.4%
Alan (4AB)
—
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
436
Good
355
Bad
81
Good %
81.4%
8 booked · Net: 2.3%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
176
Good
168
Bad
8
Good %
95.5%
12 booked · Net: 7.1%
Florida — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Organic 75 10 13.3% 14 18.7% 1 1.3% 9 12.0% 4 5 6.7% 26 49 34.7% 3 6.1%
Lead Pronto 545 6 1.1% 87 16.0% 3 0.6% 41 7.5% 43 28 5.1% 117 428 21.5% 18 4.2%
Neil Recycled 436 17 3.9% 41 9.4% 4 0.9% 9 2.1% 28 26 6.0% 81 355 18.6% 8 2.3%
Alan 503 5 1.0% 49 9.7% 2 0.4% 33 6.6% 14 6 1.2% 60 443 11.9% 22 5.0%
Blue Rooms 1,310 9 0.7% 130 9.9% 43 3.3% 44 3.4% 43 13 1.0% 151 1,159 11.5% 53 4.6%
Florida — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 8 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Organic 75 Removal Duplicate 9 12.0%
Organic 75 Rejection DUPLICATE Lead 7 9.3%
Lead Pronto 545 Removal Duplicate 41 7.5%
Alan 503 Removal Duplicate 33 6.6%
Organic 75 Removal Previous Client 3 4.0%
Lead Pronto 545 Removal Inappropriate 20 3.7%
Blue Rooms 1,310 Removal Duplicate 44 3.4%
Blue Rooms 1,310 Removal Blocked 43 3.3%
Florida — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Neil Recycled 17
DUPLICATE Lead
9 · 53%
DO NOT CALL
6 · 35%
Unemployed Undocumented
1 · 6%
Wrong Number
1 · 6%
—
Organic 10
DUPLICATE Lead
7 · 70%
Wrong Number
1 · 10%
Been to Us Already
1 · 10%
Out Of State
1 · 10%
—
Blue Rooms 9
Wrong Number
5 · 56%
DO NOT CALL
2 · 22%
DUPLICATE Lead
2 · 22%
——
Lead Pronto 6
DUPLICATE Lead
4 · 67%
DO NOT CALL
1 · 17%
Wrong Number
1 · 17%
——
Alan 5
Wrong Number
2 · 40%
Been to Us Already
1 · 20%
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 20%
DO NOT CALL
1 · 20%
—
Florida — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 130
Duplicate
44 · 34%
Blocked
43 · 33%
Pro portfolio
25 · 19%
Previous Client
11 · 8%
Too young/old
3 · 2%
Lead Pronto 87
Duplicate
41 · 47%
Inappropriate
20 · 23%
Too young/old
14 · 16%
Pro portfolio
5 · 6%
Blocked
3 · 3%
Alan 49
Duplicate
33 · 67%
Pro portfolio
5 · 10%
Inappropriate
5 · 10%
Previous Client
2 · 4%
Blocked
2 · 4%
Neil Recycled 41
Inappropriate
10 · 24%
Duplicate
9 · 22%
No Photo
6 · 15%
Too young/old
5 · 12%
Blocked
4 · 10%
Organic 14
Duplicate
9 · 64%
Previous Client
3 · 21%
Blocked
1 · 7%
Pro portfolio
1 · 7%
—
Florida — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 2,257 leads · 346 bad · 15.3% · 84 booked · Net: 4.4%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#FLFB31F 19 11 8 57.9% 8 42.1% 6 31.6% 2
#FL01 75 49 26 65.3% 10 13.3% 14 18.7% 1 1.3% 9 12.0% 4 5 6.7% 3 6.1%
#ORLFB32F 8 6 2 75.0% 2 25.0%
#FL3CX2F 4 3 1 75.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0%
#FL3CX3F 4 3 1 75.0% 1 25.0% 1
#ORLP2 334 258 76 77.2% 3 0.9% 50 15.0% 21 6.3% 29 26 7.8% 9 3.5%
#FLP2 192 153 39 79.7% 3 1.6% 36 18.8% 3 1.6% 20 10.4% 13 1 0.5% 6 3.9%
#FL1FX 296 242 54 81.8% 1 0.3% 53 17.9% 23 7.8% 17 5.7% 13 16 6.6%
#ORL1FX 314 258 56 82.2% 3 1.0% 49 15.6% 14 4.5% 23 7.3% 12 4 1.3% 15 5.8%
#FL3CX1F 80 67 13 83.8% 12 15.0% 2 2.5% 6 7.5% 4 1 1.3% 2 3.0%
#ORLFB31M 79 67 12 84.8% 1 1.3% 10 12.7% 8 10.1% 2 1 1.3% 4 6.0%
#FLFB31M 84 73 11 86.9% 1 1.2% 10 11.9% 7 8.3% 3 4 5.5%
#ORLSNAP 24 21 3 87.5% 2 8.3% 1 4.2% 1 1 4.8%
#FLFB32F 8 7 1 87.5% 1 12.5% 1 12.5%
#FLSNAP 10 9 1 90.0% 1 10.0% 1 10.0% 1 11.1%
#ORLGX 10 9 1 90.0% 1 10.0%
#FL3CX1M 45 41 4 91.1% 3 6.7% 1 2.2% 2 1 2.2% 2 4.9%
#ORLFB31F 17 16 1 94.1% 1 5.9% 1 5.9% 1 6.3%
#FLKIDSX 645 609 36 94.4% 3 0.5% 26 4.0% 5 0.8% 4 0.6% 17 8 1.2% 20 3.3%
#FL3CX2M 1 1 0 100.0%
#FLGX 8 8 0 100.0%
TOTAL 2,257 1,911 346 84.7% 27 1.2% 277 12.3% 49 2.2% 125 5.5% 103 50 2.2% 84 4.4%
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 436 leads · 81 bad · 18.6% · 8 booked · Net: 2.3%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#ORLCMN 12 9 3 75.0% 2 16.7% 1 8.3%
#FLN1N 54 41 13 75.9% 5 9.3% 8 14.8% 1 1.9% 2 3.7% 5 1 1.9% 2 4.9%
#FL6AB 158 125 33 79.1% 6 3.8% 18 11.4% 1 0.6% 3 1.9% 14 9 5.7%
#ORL5AB 10 8 2 80.0% 1 10.0% 1 1 10.0%
#ORL6AB 86 70 16 81.4% 9 10.5% 2 2.3% 2 2.3% 5 8 9.3% 4 5.7%
#ORLN1N 57 47 10 82.5% 1 1.8% 5 8.8% 2 3.5% 3 5 8.8%
#FL5AB 38 35 3 92.1% 2 5.3% 1 2.6%
#FLCMN 21 20 1 95.2% 1 4.8% 2 10.0%
TOTAL 436 355 81 81.4% 17 3.9% 41 9.4% 4 0.9% 9 2.1% 28 26 6.0% 8 2.3%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 176 leads · 8 bad · 4.5% · 12 booked · Net: 7.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#FLGXR 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0%
#FLFB31FR 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#ORLP2R 19 17 2 89.5% 1 5.3% 1 1 5.3% 3 17.6%
#FLFB31MR 11 10 1 90.9% 1 9.1% 1 10.0%
#ORLFB31MR 15 14 1 93.3% 1 6.7%
#ORL1FXR 29 28 1 96.6% 1 3.4% 1 3.4% 2 7.1%
#FLKIDSXR 35 34 1 97.1% 1 2.9% 1 2.9% 3 8.8%
#FLDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#ORLGXR 4 4 0 100.0%
#ORL4IG31MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#FL1FXR 35 35 0 100.0% 3 8.6%
#ORLDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#FL01R 2 2 0 100.0%
#FL3CX3FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLSNAPR 2 2 0 100.0%
#FL3CX1FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#FL4IG32FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#FL3CX1MR 3 3 0 100.0%
#ORL4IG31FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#FLSNAPR 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLFB31FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLFB32FR 3 3 0 100.0%
#FLFB32FR 2 2 0 100.0%
TOTAL 176 168 8 95.5% 3 1.7% 3 1.7% 0 2 1.1% 1 2 1.1% 12 7.1%
Florida — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
DUPLICATE Lead2348.9%
Wrong Number1021.3%
DO NOT CALL1021.3%
Been to Us Already24.3%
Out Of State12.1%
Unemployed Undocumented12.1%
Florida — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate13642.4%
Blocked5316.5%
Pro portfolio3912.1%
Inappropriate3711.5%
Too young/old237.2%
Previous Client226.9%
No Photo61.9%
Not Suitable51.6%
Leads In
1,106
Usable
946
85.5%
Non-Usable
160
14.5%
OOA
11
Booked
40
Gross: 3.6%
Net Book Rate
4.2%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
848
Good
716
Bad
132
Good %
84.4%
35 booked · Net: 4.9%
Alan (4AB)
—
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
205
Good
179
Bad
26
Good %
87.3%
3 booked · Net: 1.7%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
53
Good
51
Bad
2
Good %
96.2%
2 booked · Net: 3.9%
Boston — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Lead Pronto 220 12 5.5% 38 17.3% 3 1.4% 18 8.2% 17 0 50 170 22.7% 8 4.7%
Alan 164 3 1.8% 18 11.0% 1 0.6% 9 5.5% 8 0 21 143 12.8% 7 4.9%
Neil Recycled 205 5 2.4% 10 4.9% 0 2 1.0% 8 11 5.4% 26 179 12.7% 3 1.7%
Blue Rooms 517 6 1.2% 57 11.0% 18 3.5% 19 3.7% 20 0 63 454 12.2% 22 4.8%
Boston — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 4 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Lead Pronto 220 Removal Duplicate 18 8.2%
Alan 164 Removal Duplicate 9 5.5%
Blue Rooms 517 Removal Duplicate 19 3.7%
Blue Rooms 517 Removal Blocked 18 3.5%
Boston — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Lead Pronto 12
DO NOT CALL
5 · 42%
Wrong Number
3 · 25%
DUPLICATE Lead
3 · 25%
Been to Us Already
1 · 8%
—
Blue Rooms 6
DUPLICATE Lead
3 · 50%
DO NOT CALL
2 · 33%
Wrong Number
1 · 17%
——
Neil Recycled 5
DO NOT CALL
4 · 80%
Too Young
1 · 20%
———
Alan 3
Been to Us Already
2 · 67%
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 33%
———
Boston — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 57
Duplicate
19 · 33%
Blocked
18 · 32%
Inappropriate
7 · 12%
Pro portfolio
7 · 12%
Previous Client
6 · 11%
Lead Pronto 38
Duplicate
18 · 47%
Pro portfolio
6 · 16%
Too young/old
5 · 13%
Inappropriate
3 · 8%
Blocked
3 · 8%
Alan 18
Duplicate
9 · 50%
Inappropriate
4 · 22%
Previous Client
3 · 17%
Blocked
1 · 6%
Pro portfolio
1 · 6%
Neil Recycled 10
Inappropriate
4 · 40%
No Photo
3 · 30%
Duplicate
2 · 20%
Previous Client
1 · 10%
—
Boston — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 848 leads · 132 bad · 15.6% · 35 booked · Net: 4.9%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#BO3CX3F 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#BOFB32F 7 5 2 71.4% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 1 14.3%
#BOFB31F 11 8 3 72.7% 3 27.3% 2 18.2% 1
#BOSLP2 209 159 50 76.1% 12 5.7% 38 18.2% 3 1.4% 18 8.6% 17 8 5.0%
#BOFB31M 26 21 5 80.8% 2 7.7% 3 11.5% 2 7.7% 1 1 4.8%
#BOS1FX 295 241 54 81.7% 4 1.4% 50 16.9% 18 6.1% 17 5.8% 15 10 4.1%
#BO3CX1F 33 27 6 81.8% 6 18.2% 2 6.1% 4 2 7.4%
#BOSSNAP 25 22 3 88.0% 1 4.0% 2 8.0% 2
#BO3CX1M 32 30 2 93.8% 2 6.3% 1 3.1% 1 2 6.7%
#BOSKIDSX 185 179 6 96.8% 1 0.5% 5 2.7% 2 1.1% 3 12 6.7%
#BO3CX3M 2 2 0 100.0%
#BOFB32M 11 11 0 100.0%
#BO3CX2F 1 1 0 100.0%
#BOSGX 7 7 0 100.0%
#BOFB33M 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 848 716 132 84.4% 21 2.5% 111 13.1% 22 2.6% 45 5.3% 44 0 35 4.9%
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 205 leads · 26 bad · 12.7% · 3 booked · Net: 1.7%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#BOS5AB 13 8 5 61.5% 1 7.7% 2 15.4% 2 2 15.4%
#BOSCMN 15 11 4 73.3% 4 26.7%
#BOSN1N 55 49 6 89.1% 4 7.3% 1 1.8% 3 2 3.6% 1 2.0%
#BOS6AB 122 111 11 91.0% 4 3.3% 1 0.8% 3 7 5.7% 2 1.8%
TOTAL 205 179 26 87.3% 5 2.4% 10 4.9% 0 2 1.0% 8 11 5.4% 3 1.7%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 53 leads · 2 bad · 3.8% · 2 booked · Net: 3.9%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#BO3CX2MR 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1
#BO3CX1FR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 50.0%
#BOS1FXR 22 22 0 100.0%
#BOSLP2R 11 11 0 100.0%
#BO3CX1MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#BOSKIDSXR 5 5 0 100.0% 1 20.0%
#BOSSNAPR 5 5 0 100.0%
#BOSDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#BOSPXR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 53 51 2 96.2% 0 2 3.8% 0 1 1.9% 1 0 2 3.9%
Boston — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
DO NOT CALL1142.3%
DUPLICATE Lead726.9%
Wrong Number415.4%
Been to Us Already311.5%
Too Young13.8%
Boston — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate4839.0%
Blocked2217.9%
Inappropriate1814.6%
Pro portfolio1411.4%
Previous Client129.8%
Too young/old54.1%
No Photo32.4%
Spam10.8%
Leads In
1,324
Usable
1,135
85.7%
Non-Usable
189
14.3%
OOA
78
Booked
94
Gross: 7.1%
Net Book Rate
8.3%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
869
Good
763
Bad
106
Good %
87.8%
77 booked · Net: 10.1%
Alan (4AB)
—
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
390
Good
309
Bad
81
Good %
79.2%
13 booked · Net: 4.2%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
65
Good
63
Bad
2
Good %
96.9%
4 booked · Net: 6.3%
New York — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Neil Recycled 390 6 1.5% 34 8.7% 3 0.8% 12 3.1% 19 50 12.8% 81 309 20.8% 13 4.2%
Lead Pronto 164 1 0.6% 22 13.4% 3 1.8% 11 6.7% 8 0 23 141 14.0% 5 3.5%
Blue Rooms 699 10 1.4% 47 6.7% 15 2.1% 11 1.6% 21 27 3.9% 81 618 11.6% 73 11.8%
Alan 71 0 3 4.2% 0 2 2.8% 1 1 1.4% 4 67 5.6% 3 4.5%
New York — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 2 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Lead Pronto 164 Removal Duplicate 11 6.7%
Neil Recycled 390 Removal Duplicate 12 3.1%
New York — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 10
DO NOT CALL
3 · 30%
DUPLICATE Lead
3 · 30%
Out Of State
2 · 20%
Unemployed Undocumented
1 · 10%
No English Spoken
1 · 10%
Neil Recycled 6
DO NOT CALL
6 · 100%
————
Lead Pronto 1
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 100%
————
New York — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 47
Blocked
15 · 32%
Pro portfolio
15 · 32%
Duplicate
11 · 23%
Previous Client
3 · 6%
Too young/old
2 · 4%
Neil Recycled 34
Duplicate
12 · 35%
Inappropriate
7 · 21%
Previous Client
7 · 21%
Pro portfolio
3 · 9%
Blocked
3 · 9%
Lead Pronto 22
Duplicate
11 · 50%
Pro portfolio
4 · 18%
Blocked
3 · 14%
Previous Client
2 · 9%
Too young/old
1 · 5%
Alan 3
Duplicate
2 · 67%
Pro portfolio
1 · 33%
———
New York — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 869 leads · 106 bad · 12.2% · 77 booked · Net: 10.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NY1FX 287 232 55 80.8% 5 1.7% 40 13.9% 14 4.9% 10 3.5% 16 12 4.2% 14 6.0%
#NYLP2 154 131 23 85.1% 1 0.6% 22 14.3% 3 1.9% 11 7.1% 8 5 3.8%
#NY3CX1F 9 8 1 88.9% 1 11.1% 1
#NY3CX1M 9 8 1 88.9% 1 11.1%
#NYKIDSX 378 353 25 93.4% 5 1.3% 6 1.6% 1 0.3% 5 15 4.0% 58 16.4%
#NYSNAP 25 24 1 96.0% 1 4.0% 1 4.0%
#NYFB32M 2 2 0 100.0%
#NYFB31M 2 2 0 100.0%
#NY3CX2M 1 1 0 100.0%
#NY3CX2F 1 1 0 100.0%
#NYGX 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 869 763 106 87.8% 11 1.3% 70 8.1% 18 2.1% 22 2.5% 30 28 3.2% 77 10.1%
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 390 leads · 81 bad · 20.8% · 13 booked · Net: 4.2%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NYCMN 44 34 10 77.3% 4 9.1% 7 15.9% 2 5.9%
#NYN1N 81 63 18 77.8% 1 1.2% 9 11.1% 1 1.2% 1 1.2% 7 12 14.8% 5 7.9%
#NY6AB 216 170 46 78.7% 1 0.5% 21 9.7% 2 0.9% 10 4.6% 9 28 13.0% 1 0.6%
#NY5AB 49 42 7 85.7% 4 8.2% 1 2.0% 3 3 6.1% 5 11.9%
TOTAL 390 309 81 79.2% 6 1.5% 34 8.7% 3 0.8% 12 3.1% 19 50 12.8% 13 4.2%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 65 leads · 2 bad · 3.1% · 4 booked · Net: 6.3%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NYKIDSXR 40 38 2 95.0% 2 5.0% 2 5.0% 2 5.3%
#NYLP2R 10 10 0 100.0%
#NY3CX1FR 3 3 0 100.0%
#NYKPXR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NYSNAPR 8 8 0 100.0% 1 12.5%
#NY3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NY1FXR 2 2 0 100.0% 1 50.0%
TOTAL 65 63 2 96.9% 0 2 3.1% 0 2 3.1% 0 0 4 6.3%
New York — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
DO NOT CALL952.9%
DUPLICATE Lead423.5%
Out Of State211.8%
Unemployed Undocumented15.9%
No English Spoken15.9%
New York — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate3634.0%
Pro portfolio2321.7%
Blocked2119.8%
Previous Client1211.3%
Inappropriate87.5%
Too young/old32.8%
No Photo21.9%
Not Suitable10.9%
Blue Rooms — Leads In
5,133
41 codes
Usable
4,207
82.0%
Non-Usable
926
18.0%
Rejected
62
Removed
468
138 dup · 146 blk
OOA
420
Booked
271
Net: 6.4%
Blue Rooms — Worst Offending Codes (sorted by non-usable count — click any header to re-sort)
CodeCityInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedDupOtherOOABadBad %Booked
#ATKIDSX Atlanta 280 8 2.9% 8 184 189 67.5%
#AT1FX Atlanta 135 1 0.7% 10 7.4% 6 4 98 102 75.6%
#DAL1FX Dallas 317 15 4.7% 51 16.1% 18 22 11 14 78 24.6% 16
#CHI1FX Chicago 232 1 0.4% 51 22.0% 17 14 20 19 70 30.2% 3
#HOU1FX Houston 182 2 1.1% 51 28.0% 18 12 21 9 59 32.4% 9
#ORL1FX Florida 314 3 1.0% 49 15.6% 14 23 12 4 56 17.8% 15
#NY1FX New York 287 5 1.7% 40 13.9% 14 10 16 12 55 19.2% 14
#BOS1FX Boston 295 4 1.4% 50 16.9% 18 17 15 54 18.3% 10
#FL1FX Florida 296 1 0.3% 53 17.9% 23 17 13 54 18.2% 16
#NA1FX Nashville 156 3 1.9% 31 19.9% 5 8 18 4 36 23.1% 12
#FLKIDSX Florida 645 3 0.5% 26 4.0% 5 4 17 8 36 5.6% 20
#DALKIDSX Dallas 292 9 3.1% 8 2.7% 3 5 10 26 8.9% 18
#HOUKIDSX Houston 327 4 1.2% 10 3.1% 1 3 6 11 25 7.6% 19
#NYKIDSX New York 378 5 1.3% 6 1.6% 1 5 15 25 6.6% 58
#NAKIDSX Nashville 209 7 3.3% 1 3 3 13 20 9.6% 27
#CHIKIDSX Chicago 313 4 1.3% 2 2 17 20 6.4% 6
#BOSKIDSX Boston 185 1 0.5% 5 2.7% 2 3 6 3.2% 12
#ORLSNAP Florida 24 2 8.3% 1 4.2% 1 3 12.5% 1
#BOSSNAP Boston 25 1 4.0% 2 8.0% 2 3 12.0%
#CHISNAP Chicago 35 1 2.9% 2 5.7% 1 1 3 8.6% 2
#HOUGX Houston 14 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 1 2 14.3%
#NASGX Nashville 2 1 1 50.0%
#FLSNAP Florida 10 1 10.0% 1 1 10.0% 1
#ORLGX Florida 10 1 1 10.0%
#NYSNAP New York 25 1 4.0% 1 1 4.0%
#BOSSNAPR Boston 5 0 0.0%
#BOSGX Boston 7 0 0.0%
#CHISNAPR Chicago 9 0 0.0%
#CHIGX Chicago 9 0 0.0%
#DALSNAP Dallas 43 0 0.0% 7
#DALSNAPR Dallas 5 0 0.0%
#DALGX Dallas 9 0 0.0%
#ORLSNAPR Florida 2 0 0.0%
#FLSNAPR Florida 1 0 0.0%
#FLGX Florida 8 0 0.0%
#HOUSNAP Houston 14 0 0.0% 2
#HOUSNAPR Houston 3 0 0.0%
#NASSNAP Nashville 20 0 0.0% 2
#NASSNAPR Nashville 1 0 0.0%
#NYSNAPR New York 8 0 0.0% 1
#NYGX New York 1 0 0.0%
TOTAL 5,133 62 468 146 138 184 420 926 18.0% 271
Blue Rooms — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount% of rejected% of leadsBar
DO NOT CALL2438.7%0.5%
DUPLICATE Lead1524.2%0.3%
Wrong Number1219.4%0.2%
Out Of State58.1%0.1%
Unemployed Undocumented46.5%0.1%
Been to Us Already11.6%0.0%
No English Spoken11.6%0.0%
Blue Rooms — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount% of removed% of leadsBar
Blocked14631.2%2.8%
Duplicate13829.5%2.7%
Pro portfolio8417.9%1.6%
Previous Client439.2%0.8%
Inappropriate418.8%0.8%
Too young/old122.6%0.2%
Not Suitable30.6%0.1%
Spam10.2%0.0%
Blue Rooms — By City (where this supplier's bad leads land)
CityInBadBad %BookedWorst Code
Atlanta41529170.1%0#ATKIDSX
Florida1,31015111.5%53#ORL1FX
Dallas66610415.6%41#DAL1FX
Chicago5989315.6%11#CHI1FX
Houston5408615.9%30#HOU1FX
New York6998111.6%73#NY1FX
Boston5176312.2%22#BOS1FX
Nashville3885714.7%41#NA1FX
Neil Recycled — Leads In
2,067
32 codes
Usable
1,640
79.3%
Non-Usable
427
20.7%
Rejected
38
Removed
200
48 dup · 14 blk
OOA
215
Booked
47
Net: 2.9%
Neil Recycled — Worst Offending Codes (sorted by non-usable count — click any header to re-sort)
CodeCityInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedDupOtherOOABadBad %Booked
#NY6AB New York 216 1 0.5% 21 9.7% 2 10 9 28 46 21.3% 1
#CHI6AB Chicago 166 1 0.6% 27 16.3% 9 18 18 44 26.5% 2
#HOU6AB Houston 170 2 1.2% 19 11.2% 1 4 14 22 41 24.1% 3
#NA6AB Nashville 127 2 1.6% 12 9.4% 2 1 9 26 38 29.9% 2
#DAL6AB Dallas 133 1 0.8% 24 18.0% 2 3 19 15 38 28.6% 2
#FL6AB Florida 158 6 3.8% 18 11.4% 1 3 14 9 33 20.9%
#NYN1N New York 81 1 1.2% 9 11.1% 1 1 7 12 18 22.2% 5
#NAN1N Nashville 47 2 4.3% 6 12.8% 6 13 17 36.2%
#ORL6AB Florida 86 9 10.5% 2 2 5 8 16 18.6% 4
#CHIN1N Chicago 71 6 8.5% 2 1 3 8 14 19.7% 1
#FLN1N Florida 54 5 9.3% 8 14.8% 1 2 5 1 13 24.1% 2
#HOUN1N Houston 66 6 9.1% 2 4 7 12 18.2% 1
#BOS6AB Boston 122 4 3.3% 1 3 7 11 9.0% 2
#NYCMN New York 44 4 9.1% 7 10 22.7% 2
#ORLN1N Florida 57 1 1.8% 5 8.8% 2 3 5 10 17.5%
#HOU5AB Houston 43 1 2.3% 5 11.6% 2 3 3 9 20.9% 1
#DALN1N Dallas 65 5 7.7% 1 4 3 8 12.3% 1
#NY5AB New York 49 4 8.2% 1 3 3 7 14.3% 5
#BOSN1N Boston 55 4 7.3% 1 3 2 6 10.9% 1
#BOS5AB Boston 13 1 7.7% 2 15.4% 2 2 5 38.5%
#CHICMN Chicago 25 2 8.0% 1 1 3 5 20.0% 3
#BOSCMN Boston 15 4 26.7% 4 26.7%
#ORLCMN Florida 12 2 16.7% 1 3 25.0%
#NA5AB Nashville 23 1 4.3% 1 2 3 13.0% 1
#HOUCMN Houston 27 1 3.7% 3 3 11.1% 1
#CHI5AB Chicago 28 2 7.1% 1 1 1 3 10.7% 1
#FL5AB Florida 38 2 5.3% 1 3 7.9%
#ORL5AB Florida 10 1 10.0% 1 1 2 20.0%
#NACMN Nashville 14 2 2 14.3% 1
#DALCMN Dallas 12 1 1 8.3%
#DAL5AB Dallas 19 1 1 5.3% 3
#FLCMN Florida 21 1 4.8% 1 4.8% 2
TOTAL 2,067 38 200 14 48 138 215 427 20.7% 47
Neil Recycled — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount% of rejected% of leadsBar
DO NOT CALL1642.1%0.8%
DUPLICATE Lead1231.6%0.6%
Out Of State410.5%0.2%
Wrong Number37.9%0.1%
Too Young12.6%0.0%
Been to Us Already12.6%0.0%
Unemployed Undocumented12.6%0.0%
Neil Recycled — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount% of removed% of leadsBar
Duplicate4824.0%2.3%
Inappropriate4422.0%2.1%
No Photo2512.5%1.2%
Previous Client2512.5%1.2%
Pro portfolio2512.5%1.2%
Too young/old178.5%0.8%
Blocked147.0%0.7%
Not Suitable21.0%0.1%
Neil Recycled — By City (where this supplier's bad leads land)
CityInBadBad %BookedWorst Code
Florida4368118.6%8#FL6AB
New York3908120.8%13#NY6AB
Chicago2906622.8%7#CHI6AB
Houston3066521.2%6#HOU6AB
Nashville2116028.4%4#NA6AB
Dallas2294821.0%6#DAL6AB
Boston2052612.7%3#BOS6AB
Lead Pronto — Leads In
1,694
14 codes
Usable
1,341
79.2%
Non-Usable
353
20.8%
Rejected
43
Removed
269
136 dup · 14 blk
OOA
49
Booked
73
Net: 5.4%
Lead Pronto — Worst Offending Codes (sorted by non-usable count — click any header to re-sort)
CodeCityInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedDupOtherOOABadBad %Booked
#ORLP2 Florida 334 3 0.9% 50 15.0% 21 29 26 76 22.8% 9
#DALP2 Dallas 159 10 6.3% 40 25.2% 2 21 17 8 57 35.8% 7
#BOSLP2 Boston 209 12 5.7% 38 18.2% 3 18 17 50 23.9% 8
#HOULP2 Houston 233 6 2.6% 33 14.2% 3 14 16 5 43 18.5% 10
#FLP2 Florida 192 3 1.6% 36 18.8% 3 20 13 1 39 20.3% 6
#CHILP2 Chicago 237 3 1.3% 34 14.3% 23 11 37 15.6% 19
#NYLP2 New York 154 1 0.6% 22 14.3% 3 11 8 23 14.9% 5
#NALP2 Nashville 102 3 2.9% 13 12.7% 8 5 6 21 20.6% 5
#NALP2R Nashville 16 1 6.3% 1 6.3% 1 1 3 18.8% 1
#HOULP2R Houston 11 1 9.1% 1 9.1% 1 1 2 18.2%
#ORLP2R Florida 19 1 5.3% 1 1 2 10.5% 3
#BOSLP2R Boston 11 0 0.0%
#DALP2R Dallas 7 0 0.0%
#NYLP2R New York 10 0 0.0%
TOTAL 1,694 43 269 14 136 119 49 353 20.8% 73
Lead Pronto — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount% of rejected% of leadsBar
DUPLICATE Lead1432.6%0.8%
DO NOT CALL1432.6%0.8%
Wrong Number1125.6%0.6%
Been to Us Already24.7%0.1%
Out Of State24.7%0.1%
Lead Pronto — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount% of removed% of leadsBar
Duplicate13650.6%8.0%
Inappropriate5018.6%3.0%
Pro portfolio3211.9%1.9%
Too young/old259.3%1.5%
Blocked145.2%0.8%
Previous Client93.3%0.5%
Not Suitable20.7%0.1%
Spam10.4%0.1%
Lead Pronto — By City (where this supplier's bad leads land)
CityInBadBad %BookedWorst Code
Florida54511721.5%18#ORLP2
Dallas1665734.3%7#DALP2
Boston2205022.7%8#BOSLP2
Houston2444518.4%10#HOULP2
Chicago2373715.6%19#CHILP2
Nashville1182420.3%6#NALP2
New York1642314.0%5#NYLP2
Alan — Leads In
1,711
147 codes
Usable
1,490
87.1%
Non-Usable
221
12.9%
Rejected
35
Removed
150
89 dup · 4 blk
OOA
41
Booked
92
Net: 6.2%
Alan — Worst Offending Codes (sorted by non-usable count — click any header to re-sort)
CodeCityInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedDupOtherOOABadBad %Booked
#DAL3CX1F Dallas 100 6 6.0% 11 11.0% 4 7 3 18 18.0% 1
#FL3CX1F Florida 80 12 15.0% 2 6 4 1 13 16.3% 2
#DALFB31M Dallas 62 2 3.2% 10 16.1% 9 1 12 19.4% 7
#ORLFB31M Florida 79 1 1.3% 10 12.7% 8 2 1 12 15.2% 4
#DAL3CX1M Dallas 62 4 6.5% 4 6.5% 1 3 3 11 17.7% 5
#FLFB31M Florida 84 1 1.2% 10 11.9% 7 3 11 13.1% 4
#HOUFB31M Houston 89 3 3.4% 5 5.6% 3 2 2 10 11.2% 7
#NA3CX1F Nashville 26 1 3.8% 7 26.9% 4 3 2 9 34.6% 1
#CHIFB31M Chicago 57 1 1.8% 8 14.0% 7 1 9 15.8% 6
#FLFB31F Florida 19 8 42.1% 6 2 8 42.1%
#HOU3CX1M Houston 32 3 9.4% 1 1 1 4 7 21.9% 2
#HOUFB31F Houston 29 1 3.4% 3 10.3% 2 1 2 6 20.7%
#BO3CX1F Boston 33 6 18.2% 2 4 6 18.2% 2
#BOFB31M Boston 26 2 7.7% 3 11.5% 2 1 5 19.2% 1
#HOU3CX1F Houston 40 1 2.5% 3 7.5% 3 1 5 12.5% 5
#CHI3CX1F Chicago 31 3 9.7% 1 2 1 4 12.9% 1
#FL3CX1M Florida 45 3 6.7% 1 2 1 4 8.9% 2
#BOFB31F Boston 11 3 27.3% 2 1 3 27.3%
#CHIKIDSXR Chicago 16 2 12.5% 1 3 18.8%
#CHIFB31F Chicago 24 1 4.2% 2 8.3% 1 1 3 12.5%
#DAL3CX2F Dallas 3 2 66.7% 1 1 2 66.7%
#NAFB32F Nashville 5 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 2 40.0%
#DALFB31F Dallas 6 2 33.3% 2 2 33.3%
#BOFB32F Boston 7 2 28.6% 1 1 2 28.6%
#DAL3CX3F Dallas 7 1 14.3% 1 1 2 28.6%
#ORLFB32F Florida 8 2 2 25.0%
#NA3CX1M Nashville 12 1 8.3% 1 1 2 16.7% 1
#DAL1FXR Dallas 14 1 7.1% 1 1 2 14.3% 1
#CHIFB32M Chicago 18 1 5.6% 1 1 2 11.1% 1
#NAFB31M Nashville 24 1 4.2% 1 4.2% 1 1 2 8.3% 1
#DALFB32M Dallas 27 2 7.4% 2 2 7.4%
#CHI1FXR Chicago 30 1 3.3% 1 1 2 6.7% 2
#BO3CX1M Boston 32 2 6.3% 1 1 2 6.3% 2
#NYKIDSXR New York 40 2 5.0% 2 2 5.0% 2
#BO3CX2MR Boston 1 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%
#CHI3CX3F Chicago 1 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%
#FLGXR Florida 1 1 100.0% 1 100.0%
#HOU3CX2M Houston 1 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%
#FLFB31FR Florida 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#HOUGXR Houston 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#HOUFB32FR Houston 2 1 1 50.0%
#BO3CX3F Boston 3 1 33.3% 1 33.3%
#BO3CX1FR Boston 3 1 33.3% 1 1 33.3% 1
#DALFB31FR Dallas 3 1 33.3% 1 1 33.3%
#HOUFB32MR Houston 3 1 1 33.3%
#HOU3CX1FR Houston 3 1 1 33.3%
#HOU3CX2F Houston 3 1 1 33.3%
#NADXR Nashville 3 1 33.3% 1 1 33.3%
#NA3CX1MR Nashville 3 1 1 33.3%
#DALFB32F Dallas 4 1 25.0% 1 1 25.0%
#FL3CX2F Florida 4 1 25.0% 1 1 25.0%
#FL3CX3F Florida 4 1 25.0% 1 1 25.0%
#NA3CX2F Nashville 4 1 25.0% 1 25.0%
#NAFB31F Nashville 4 1 25.0% 1 1 25.0%
#FLFB32F Florida 8 1 12.5% 1 1 12.5%
#NY3CX1F New York 9 1 11.1% 1 1 11.1%
#NY3CX1M New York 9 1 1 11.1%
#FLFB31MR Florida 11 1 9.1% 1 9.1% 1
#NA1FXR Nashville 11 1 9.1% 1 1 9.1% 2
#CHIFB32F Chicago 12 1 1 8.3% 2
#ORLFB31MR Florida 15 1 1 6.7%
#HOU1FXR Houston 15 1 1 6.7%
#ORLFB31F Florida 17 1 5.9% 1 1 5.9% 1
#CHI3CX1M Chicago 22 1 1 4.5% 2
#DALKIDSXR Dallas 22 1 4.5% 1 1 4.5% 4
#HOUFB32M Houston 24 1 4.2% 1 1 4.2%
#ORL1FXR Florida 29 1 3.4% 1 1 3.4% 2
#FLKIDSXR Florida 35 1 2.9% 1 1 2.9% 3
#BOS1FXR Boston 22 0 0.0%
#BO3CX1MR Boston 2 0 0.0%
#BOSKIDSXR Boston 5 0 0.0% 1
#BO3CX3M Boston 2 0 0.0%
#BOFB32M Boston 11 0 0.0%
#BOSDXR Boston 3 0 0.0%
#BO3CX2F Boston 1 0 0.0%
#BOSPXR Boston 1 0 0.0%
#BOFB33M Boston 1 0 0.0%
#CHIFB31MR Chicago 3 0 0.0%
#CHIFB32MR Chicago 2 0 0.0%
#CHIFB33FR Chicago 1 0 0.0%
#CHI3CX3M Chicago 2 0 0.0% 1
#CHI3CX1MR Chicago 1 0 0.0%
#CHIDXR Chicago 3 0 0.0%
#CHI3CX2M Chicago 2 0 0.0%
#CHIGXR Chicago 2 0 0.0%
#CHI3CX1FR Chicago 1 0 0.0%
#CHI3CX2F Chicago 2 0 0.0%
#CHIFB33F Chicago 1 0 0.0%
#CHIFB33M Chicago 2 0 0.0%
#CHI12FR Chicago 1 0 0.0%
#DAL3CX2M Dallas 5 0 0.0%
#DALDXR Dallas 1 0 0.0%
#DAL3CX2FR Dallas 2 0 0.0%
#DALFB31MR Dallas 2 0 0.0%
#DAL3CX1FR Dallas 5 0 0.0% 1
#DAL3CX1MR Dallas 1 0 0.0% 1
#DALFB32MR Dallas 2 0 0.0%
#DALGXR Dallas 3 0 0.0% 1
#DALFB33M Dallas 1 0 0.0%
#DALFB33F Dallas 1 0 0.0%
#FLDXR Florida 3 0 0.0%
#ORLGXR Florida 4 0 0.0%
#ORL4IG31MR Florida 1 0 0.0%
#FL1FXR Florida 35 0 0.0% 3
#ORLDXR Florida 3 0 0.0%
#FL01R Florida 2 0 0.0%
#FL3CX3FR Florida 1 0 0.0%
#FL3CX1FR Florida 1 0 0.0%
#FL3CX2M Florida 1 0 0.0%
#FL4IG32FR Florida 1 0 0.0%
#FL3CX1MR Florida 3 0 0.0%
#ORL4IG31FR Florida 1 0 0.0%
#ORLFB31FR Florida 1 0 0.0%
#ORLFB32FR Florida 3 0 0.0%
#FLFB32FR Florida 2 0 0.0%
#HOUFB32F Houston 12 0 0.0% 1
#HOUFB33M Houston 6 0 0.0%
#HOUKXR Houston 1 0 0.0%
#HOUFB31MR Houston 4 0 0.0%
#HOUFB31FR Houston 2 0 0.0%
#HOUKIDSXR Houston 3 0 0.0%
#HOU3CX2MR Houston 1 0 0.0%
#HOUFB33FR Houston 1 0 0.0%
#HOU3CX1MR Houston 1 0 0.0%
#HOUFB33F Houston 1 0 0.0%
#HOU3CX3F Houston 1 0 0.0%
#NAFB32M Nashville 14 0 0.0% 2
#NASGXR Nashville 4 0 0.0%
#NAKIDSXR Nashville 5 0 0.0% 2
#NA3CX1FR Nashville 3 0 0.0%
#NAFB33FR Nashville 2 0 0.0%
#NAFB32MR Nashville 2 0 0.0%
#NAFB32FR Nashville 1 0 0.0%
#NAFB31MR Nashville 1 0 0.0%
#NA3CX3F Nashville 1 0 0.0%
#NAFB33MR Nashville 2 0 0.0%
#NA4ABR Nashville 1 0 0.0%
#NAFB31FR Nashville 1 0 0.0%
#NAFB33F Nashville 1 0 0.0%
#NY3CX1FR New York 3 0 0.0%
#NYKPXR New York 1 0 0.0%
#NY3CX1MR New York 1 0 0.0%
#NYFB32M New York 2 0 0.0%
#NYFB31M New York 2 0 0.0%
#NY1FXR New York 2 0 0.0% 1
#NY3CX2M New York 1 0 0.0%
#NY3CX2F New York 1 0 0.0%
TOTAL 1,711 35 150 4 89 57 41 221 12.9% 92
Alan — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount% of rejected% of leadsBar
DUPLICATE Lead1028.6%0.6%
Wrong Number720.0%0.4%
Been to Us Already617.1%0.4%
DO NOT CALL617.1%0.4%
Out Of State411.4%0.2%
Unemployed Undocumented25.7%0.1%
Alan — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount% of removed% of leadsBar
Duplicate8959.3%5.2%
Pro portfolio2315.3%1.3%
Inappropriate1610.7%0.9%
Previous Client128.0%0.7%
Too young/old53.3%0.3%
Blocked42.7%0.2%
Not Suitable10.7%0.1%
Alan — By City (where this supplier's bad leads land)
CityInBadBad %BookedWorst Code
Florida5036011.9%22#FL3CX1F
Dallas3335416.2%21#DAL3CX1F
Houston2763613.0%15#HOUFB31M
Chicago2342611.1%15#CHIFB31M
Boston1642112.8%7#BO3CX1F
Nashville1302015.4%9#NA3CX1F
New York7145.6%3#NYKIDSXR
Organic — Leads In
75
1 codes
Usable
49
65.3%
Non-Usable
26
34.7%
Rejected
10
Removed
14
9 dup · 1 blk
OOA
5
Booked
3
Net: 6.1%
Organic — Worst Offending Codes (sorted by non-usable count — click any header to re-sort)
CodeCityInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedDupOtherOOABadBad %Booked
#FL01 Florida 75 10 13.3% 14 18.7% 1 9 4 5 26 34.7% 3
TOTAL 75 10 14 1 9 4 5 26 34.7% 3
Organic — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount% of rejected% of leadsBar
DUPLICATE Lead770.0%9.3%
Wrong Number110.0%1.3%
Been to Us Already110.0%1.3%
Out Of State110.0%1.3%
Organic — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount% of removed% of leadsBar
Duplicate964.3%12.0%
Previous Client321.4%4.0%
Blocked17.1%1.3%
Pro portfolio17.1%1.3%
Organic — By City (where this supplier's bad leads land)
CityInBadBad %BookedWorst Code
Florida752634.7%3#FL01
Net Book % = bookings / usable leads  ·  Bad = unique leads that are rejected, removed, or OOA (deduplicated — each lead counted once)  ·  Usable = leads in − bad  ·  Only leads that arrived in this period are counted
Generated 9/20/2026, 6:08:47 AM  ·  CRM: Onyx Black  ·  7 days  ·  OOA: >200mi  ·  9239 zips cached