2026-03-13 → 2026-09-10 · 13 2-week blocks · 8 cities · download the CSV · every block is a full 14 days, Friday → Thursday, so the columns compare directly
Showing 2-week blocks · switch to calendar months — same cities, same metrics, different grain. Blocks are equal length so the columns compare directly; months are what most people read.
Revenue
$20.22M
Deals
7,704
Rev / deal
$2,625
Cash up front
$7.37M
Close rate
72.4%
Bookings
18,115
Booking rate
5.6%
Show rate
57.0%
Revenue
Package price written, dated to the period the viewing fell in. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Average package price on a closed sale. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Of everyone who sat down with a viewer, the share who bought. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Share of the package price collected on the day rather than financed. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Average cash collected on the day, across sales whose package price was over $300. The $300 floor strips out the photo-only sales, which are numerous and tiny and drag a plain average down without saying anything about how the deposit was sold. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Leads that became a booking, on the lead-cohort basis. † Florida and Orlando share a pool. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Bookings as a share of leads received in that period. Lead-cohort basis, so the newest periods under-read until those leads mature. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Appointment basis: on the calendar minus no-shows and cancellations. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
KIDSX (Blue Rooms) + KX (Google) combined. † Florida and Orlando share a pool. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
KIDS leads as a share of every lead that city received in that period. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
The same nine tables as the 2-week blocks tab, by months. Separate pull, slightly different window, so the two tabs will not tie to the penny — compare the direction, not the cent.
Revenue
Package price written, dated to the period the viewing fell in. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Average package price on a closed sale. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Of everyone who sat down with a viewer, the share who bought. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Share of the package price collected on the day rather than financed. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Average cash collected on the day, across sales whose package price was over $300. The $300 floor strips out the photo-only sales, which are numerous and tiny and drag a plain average down without saying anything about how the deposit was sold. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Leads that became a booking, on the lead-cohort basis. † Florida and Orlando share a pool. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Bookings as a share of leads received in that period. Lead-cohort basis, so the newest periods under-read until those leads mature. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Appointment basis: on the calendar minus no-shows and cancellations. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
KIDSX (Blue Rooms) + KX (Google) combined. † Florida and Orlando share a pool. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
KIDS leads as a share of every lead that city received in that period. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Three different bases on this page — they do not reconcile to each other, and should not. Revenue, deals, cash, close rate, viewers come from the CRM viewings feed, one row per client who sat down with a viewer. City = the studio they shot at. Settled — this is the money. Leads, bookings, booking % come from the CRM ROI feed, keyed to the day the lead arrived. City = the marketing code. Show % is the appointment basis — on the calendar minus no-shows and cancellations, keyed to the appointment date, so it is always settled. That is the same basis as the CRM's own Show Rate report. The lead-cohort show % is shown beside it in the Funnel tab and reads lower on recent months because those leads have not finished maturing. †Florida and Orlando share a lead pool. FL* codes shoot at both studios, so leads, bookings and shows are shown for the pair, not split. Revenue and deals are studio-true and stay separate.
Biggest gaps against the network median
Nashville — show rate 49.6% vs a median of 56.7%, worth about $611,348 a year Houston — cash up front 25.9% vs a median of 35.2%, worth about $490,910 a year Houston — booking rate 5.1% vs a median of 5.6%, worth about $489,874 a year
City
Revenue
Deals
Rev / deal
Cash up front
Cash on day per $300+ sale
Seen
Close %
Leads
Bookings
Booking %
KIDS leads
Show %
Rev / seen
Rev / lead
Boston
$1,958,712
796
$2,461
$690,907 35.3%
$909
1,047
76.0%
30,568
1,900
6.2%
6,889 22.5%
60.1%
$1,871
$64
Chicago
$2,676,760
1,088
$2,460
$1,005,136 37.6%
$952
1,522
71.5%
45,231
2,318
5.1%
7,651 16.9%
60.5%
$1,759
$59
Dallas
$2,763,217
1,056
$2,617
$1,244,464 45.0%
$1,241
1,543
68.4%
42,664
2,452
5.7%
5,872 13.8%
59.6%
$1,791
$65
Florida
$2,343,753
838
$2,797
$1,050,043 44.8%
$1,275
1,198
69.9%
86,467 †
4,870 †
5.6%
20,421 23.6%†
56.7%
$1,956
$63 †
Houston
$2,631,279
953
$2,761
$680,601 25.9%
$732
1,316
72.4%
42,509
2,178
5.1%
8,615 20.3%
56.7%
$1,999
$62
Nashville
$1,938,138
833
$2,327
$675,651 34.9%
$830
1,048
79.5%
29,758
1,905
6.4%
5,679 19.1%
49.6%
$1,849
$65
New York
$2,769,073
1,059
$2,615
$924,847 33.4%
$912
1,452
72.9%
44,682
2,492
5.6%
12,776 28.6%
55.6%
$1,907
$62
Orlando
$3,141,131
1,081
$2,906
$1,103,000 35.1%
$1,040
1,517
71.3%
86,467 †
4,870 †
5.6%
20,421 23.6%†
56.7%
$2,071
$63 †
TOTAL
$20,222,063
7,704
$2,625
$7,374,64836.5%
$988
10,643
72.4%
321,879
18,115
5.6%
67,90321.1%
57.0%
$1,900
$63
Lead → booked → showed
Where each city loses people between a lead arriving and someone sitting in the studio. Show % (cohort) is the lead-basis number and lags; the Showed column is the settled appointment basis. Florida and Orlando are one row — their codes cannot be split by studio.
City
Leads
Booked
On calendar
Did not show
Showed
Show % (cohort)
Lead → show %
Boston
30,568
1,900 6.2%
2,135
852 39.9%
1,283 60.1%
49.0%
3.0%
Chicago
45,231
2,318 5.1%
2,674
1,055 39.5%
1,619 60.5%
52.5%
2.7%
Dallas
42,664
2,452 5.7%
2,702
1,091 40.4%
1,611 59.6%
51.5%
3.0%
Florida + Orlando
86,467
4,870 5.6%
5,393
2,336 43.3%
3,057 56.7%
49.3%
2.8%
Houston
42,509
2,178 5.1%
2,619
1,135 43.3%
1,484 56.7%
51.8%
2.7%
Nashville
29,758
1,905 6.4%
2,338
1,178 50.4%
1,160 49.6%
41.5%
2.7%
New York
44,682
2,492 5.6%
2,854
1,267 44.4%
1,587 55.6%
46.2%
2.6%
KIDS leads received, and what they turn into
KIDS runs on two code families and both are counted here: *KIDSX is the Blue Rooms Instagram/Facebook buy, *KX is the same product on Google. They are shown split as well as combined because Orlando has no KIDSX codes at all — every Orlando kids lead arrives on KX, so a KIDSX-only count would report Orlando as having no kids business. Leads, bookings and show rate are the shared FL/ORL pool for those two cities (†); viewings, deals and revenue are studio-true.
City
KIDS leads
…KIDSX (Blue Rooms)
…KX (Google)
% of city leads
KIDS booked
KIDS show %
KIDS seen
KIDS deals
KIDS close %
KIDS revenue
KIDS rev / deal
Non-KIDS rev / deal
Boston
6,889
6,188
701
22.5%
601 8.7%
69.9%
346
269
77.7%
$703,268 35.9%
$2,614
$2,382
Chicago
7,651
6,012
1,639
16.9%
463 6.1%
71.8%
292
215
73.6%
$541,699 20.2%
$2,520
$2,446
Dallas
5,872
4,781
1,091
13.8%
537 9.1%
69.3%
375
257
68.5%
$681,637 24.7%
$2,652
$2,605
Florida
20,421 †
17,830
2,591
23.6%
1,389 6.8%
69.8%
401
291
72.6%
$815,023 34.8%
$2,801
$2,795
Houston
8,615
7,401
1,214
20.3%
618 7.2%
69.6%
334
235
70.4%
$710,199 27.0%
$3,022
$2,676
Nashville
5,679
4,524
1,155
19.1%
499 8.8%
61.7%
259
210
81.1%
$527,165 27.2%
$2,510
$2,265
New York
12,776
10,076
2,700
28.6%
850 6.7%
62.8%
447
322
72.0%
$921,069 33.3%
$2,860
$2,507
Orlando
as above
as above
as above
as above
as above
as above
396
279
70.5%
$865,902 27.6%
$3,104
$2,837
TOTAL
67,903
56,812
11,091
21.1%
4,9577.3%
2,850
2,078
72.9%
$5,765,96228.5%
$2,775
Viewers per city, and how much is worked remotely
There is no remote/in-studio flag in the CRM. This is derived: a viewer's home city is wherever they took most of their viewings over the window, so any viewing they took for a different city can only have happened on Zoom. It will understate a viewer who works remotely into their own home city.
City
Viewers
Home-based
Remote (out-of-city)
Viewings taken remotely
Revenue written remotely
Viewings / viewer
Revenue / viewer
Occasional cover
Boston
7
2
5
147 14.0%
$240,258 12.3%
150
$279,816
8
Chicago
11
4
7
381 25.0%
$676,996 25.3%
138
$243,342
7
Dallas
7
3
4
67 4.3%
$103,732 3.8%
220
$394,745
4
Florida
13
4
9
142 11.9%
$252,815 10.8%
92
$180,289
3
Houston
4
2
2
23 1.7%
$15,950 0.6%
329
$657,820
2
Nashville
9
1
8
341 32.5%
$616,073 31.8%
116
$215,349
3
New York
8
4
4
68 4.7%
$75,000 2.7%
182
$346,134
5
Orlando
10
3
7
616 40.6%
$1,177,951 37.5%
152
$314,113
4
Every viewer, by city worked
A viewer who works more than one city appears once per city. Rank colours only apply where they saw 20+ clients. Cash / sale ($300+ sales) is the average taken on the day across sales over $300 — it strips out the sub-$300 photo-only sales that drag a plain average down. Took $300+ up front counts the sales where the deposit itself reached $300, which is the deposit-quality read rather than the deal-size one.
Viewer
Working for
Home city
Seen
Sold
Close %
Revenue
Rev / deal
Cash up front
Cash / sale $300+ sales
Took $300+ up front
Audra T
Orlando
Orlando
833
611
73.3%
$1,861,780
$3,047
$646,432 34.7%
$1,072
481 78.7%
Angela K
Houston
Houston
726
601
82.8%
$1,694,425
$2,819
$385,330 22.7%
$664
427 71.0%
Elly R
Dallas
Dallas
771
580
75.2%
$1,414,903
$2,439
$579,107 40.9%
$1,041
421 72.6%
Terri M
Florida
Florida
650
491
75.5%
$1,398,923
$2,849
$640,408 45.8%
$1,316
433 88.2%
Liz G
Nashville
Nashville
707
579
81.9%
$1,322,065
$2,283
$436,331 33.0%
$762
354 61.1%
Samuel G
Chicago
Chicago
695
502
72.2%
$1,229,164
$2,449
$512,725 41.7%
$1,026
384 76.5%
Debra W
New York
New York
648
479
73.9%
$1,111,375
$2,320
$438,075 39.4%
$980
346 72.2%
Josie R
New York
New York
443
311
70.2%
$1,020,628
$3,282
$286,332 28.1%
$923
273 87.8%
Dawn B
Houston
Houston
567
342
60.3%
$920,904
$2,693
$289,921 31.5%
$852
279 81.6%
Jodi S
Boston
Boston
548
425
77.6%
$897,475
$2,112
$364,543 40.6%
$918
338 79.5%
Naomi W
Boston
Boston
348
272
78.2%
$816,179
$3,001
$208,368 25.5%
$787
216 79.4%
Kriss A
Florida
Florida
385
242
62.9%
$661,240
$2,732
$292,869 44.3%
$1,243
208 86.0%
Lauren B
Dallas
Dallas
327
212
64.8%
$652,004
$3,075
$329,734 50.6%
$1,684
169 79.7%
Rachel S
Dallas
Dallas
374
218
58.3%
$588,928
$2,702
$310,963 52.8%
$1,479
192 88.1%
Kriss A
Orlando remote
Florida
282
173
61.3%
$486,700
$2,813
$209,962 43.1%
$1,253
137 79.2%
Megan B
Chicago
Chicago
268
187
69.8%
$410,930
$2,197
$102,281 24.9%
$597
135 72.2%
Alex V
Orlando remote
New York
194
145
74.7%
$399,800
$2,757
$106,200 26.6%
$741
121 83.4%
Alex V
New York
New York
206
165
80.1%
$395,570
$2,397
$127,220 32.2%
$790
134 81.2%
Fabio Como
Chicago
Chicago
165
132
80.0%
$351,270
$2,661
$113,715 32.4%
$873
108 81.8%
Lauren B
Chicago remote
Dallas
152
107
70.4%
$325,675
$3,044
$159,083 48.8%
$1,566
85 79.4%
Alex V
Chicago remote
New York
112
88
78.6%
$212,575
$2,416
$72,160 33.9%
$828
75 85.2%
Alex V
Nashville remote
New York
93
73
78.5%
$170,650
$2,338
$49,749 29.2%
$690
54 74.0%
Tiffany L
New York
New York
86
69
80.2%
$166,500
$2,413
$49,770 29.9%
$791
51 73.9%
Rachel S
Nashville remote
Dallas
71
53
74.6%
$151,925
$2,867
$92,625 61.0%
$1,810
47 88.7%
Mackenzie C
Orlando
Orlando
62
49
79.0%
$101,400
$2,069
$20,782 20.5%
$434
30 61.2%
Lauren B
Boston remote
Dallas
44
35
79.5%
$94,850
$2,710
$51,045 53.8%
$1,458
28 80.0%
Naomi W
Orlando remote
Boston
47
30
63.8%
$88,566
$2,952
$25,049 28.3%
$922
25 83.3%
Fabio Como
Orlando remote
Chicago
32
26
81.3%
$78,360
$3,014
$32,470 41.4%
$1,249
20 76.9%
Naomi W
Nashville remote
Boston
32
27
84.4%
$78,078
$2,892
$15,421 19.8%
$588
18 66.7%
Jodi S
Nashville remote
Boston
52
37
71.2%
$73,800
$1,995
$33,725 45.7%
$1,010
28 75.7%
Lauren B
Nashville remote
Dallas
37
29
78.4%
$71,345
$2,460
$22,095 31.0%
$866
19 65.5%
Lauren B
Florida remote
Dallas
29
19
65.5%
$61,750
$3,250
$22,830 37.0%
$1,418
14 73.7%
Kriss A
Boston remote
Florida
38
22
57.9%
$61,450
$2,793
$27,500 44.8%
$1,250
16 72.7%
Mackenzie C
Dallas remote
Orlando
31
25
80.6%
$58,900
$2,356
$14,228 24.2%
$639
19 76.0%
Fabio Como
Florida remote
Chicago
27
20
74.1%
$57,184
$2,859
$22,870 40.0%
$1,144
18 90.0%
Kriss A
Chicago remote
Florida
54
26
48.1%
$52,650
$2,025
$25,650 48.7%
$1,060
14 53.8%
Lauren B
Orlando remote
Dallas
17
15
88.2%
$51,700
$3,447
$25,300 48.9%
$1,804
11 73.3%
Alex V
Boston remote
New York
29
22
75.9%
$50,940
$2,315
$20,590 40.4%
$936
19 86.4%
Rachel S
Florida remote
Dallas
25
16
64.0%
$45,450
$2,841
$31,090 68.4%
$1,943
14 87.5%
Kriss A
Nashville remote
Florida
28
21
75.0%
$44,925
$2,139
$15,075 33.6%
$789
12 57.1%
Rachel S
Orlando remote
Dallas
23
17
73.9%
$41,275
$2,428
$30,715 74.4%
$1,807
15 88.2%
Mackenzie C
Chicago remote
Orlando
23
16
69.6%
$39,200
$2,450
$7,245 18.5%
$509
11 68.8%
Mackenzie C
New York remote
Orlando
22
15
68.2%
$33,600
$2,240
$10,385 30.9%
$736
10 66.7%
Elly R
Orlando remote
Dallas
16
15
93.8%
$31,550
$2,103
$6,090 19.3%
$406
9 60.0%
Josie R
Florida remote
New York
19
9
47.4%
$29,399
$3,267
$15,599 53.1%
$1,733
8 88.9%
Naomi W
Florida remote
Boston
14
11
78.6%
$28,682
$2,607
$5,482 19.1%
$543
7 63.6%
Kriss A
New York remote
Florida
23
11
47.8%
$26,000
$2,364
$9,475 36.4%
$861
9 81.8%
Rachel S
Boston remote
Dallas
20
10
50.0%
$25,218
$2,522
$13,391 53.1%
$1,488
9 90.0%
Naomi W
Chicago remote
Boston
14
11
78.6%
$23,095
$2,100
$6,172 26.7%
$587
7 63.6%
Mackenzie C
Nashville remote
Orlando
18
13
72.2%
$21,300
$1,638
$6,580 30.9%
$506
9 69.2%
Bee Keskin
Florida
Florida
9
8
88.9%
$18,425
$2,303
$7,315 39.7%
$914
6 75.0%
Kriss A
Dallas remote
Florida
10
7
70.0%
$18,000
$2,571
$4,300 23.9%
$717
6 85.7%
Megan B
Florida remote
Chicago
10
6
60.0%
$17,000
$2,833
$3,100 18.2%
$517
6 100.0%
Alex V
Houston remote
New York
16
9
56.3%
$15,350
$1,706
$5,200 33.9%
$650
5 55.6%
Naomi W
Dallas remote
Boston
11
6
54.5%
$13,532
$2,255
$2,982 22.0%
$576
4 66.7%
Lauren B
New York remote
Dallas
10
5
50.0%
$12,650
$2,530
$2,500 19.8%
$588
4 80.0%
Lee F
Florida
Florida
9
4
44.4%
$11,550
$2,888
$3,000 26.0%
$750
2 50.0%
Jodi S
Chicago remote
Boston
10
6
60.0%
$10,600
$1,767
$2,725 25.7%
$454
5 83.3%
Alex V
Dallas remote
New York
7
4
57.1%
$9,900
$2,475
$1,850 18.7%
$463
3 75.0%
Angela K
Chicago remote
Houston
10
3
30.0%
$8,800
$2,933
$1,030 11.7%
$343
2 66.7%
Tequila Williams
Chicago
Chicago
9
7
77.8%
$8,400
$1,200
$1,500 17.9%
$214
3 42.9%
Mackenzie C
Florida remote
Orlando
7
5
71.4%
$8,150
$1,630
$2,750 33.7%
$550
5 100.0%
Mackenzie C
Boston remote
Orlando
7
5
71.4%
$7,000
$1,400
$3,430 49.0%
$686
5 100.0%
Alex V
Florida remote
New York
5
4
80.0%
$4,800
$1,200
$2,150 44.8%
$538
4 100.0%
Rachel S
New York remote
Dallas
7
2
28.6%
$1,950
$975
$600 30.8%
$300
1 50.0%
Kriss A
Houston remote
Florida
5
1
20.0%
$600
$600
$150 25.0%
$150
0 0.0%
Natalia Granado
Florida remote
Orlando
5
0
0.0%
$0
—
$0 —
—
0 —
Natalia Granado
Orlando
Orlando
6
0
0.0%
$0
—
$0 —
—
0 —
Lee F
Nashville remote
Florida
6
0
0.0%
$0
—
$0 —
—
0 —
36 viewer/city pairs with fewer than 5 viewings are not listed (one-off cover). Their viewings and revenue ARE included in every total above.
Where the money is
Every city/metric pair sitting below the network median, priced at what closing the gap to median would be worth. Held at the city's own deal size and close rate — no assumption that a weak city suddenly sells like the best one. Sorted by annual value.
City
What is below the network median
This city
Network median
Gap
Worth (6 mths)
Worth / year
Nashville
Show rate
of everyone booked onto the calendar who actually turned up
49.6%
56.7%
7.1%
$305,674
$611,348
Houston
Cash up front
share of the sale collected on the day, not financed
25.9%
35.2%
9.3%
$245,455
$490,910cash timing
Houston
Booking rate
of leads that became a booking
5.1%
5.6%
0.5%
$244,937
$489,874
Chicago
Booking rate
of leads that became a booking
5.1%
5.6%
0.5%
$244,382
$488,764
Nashville
Revenue per deal
average package price on a closed sale
$2,327
$2,616
$289
$240,774
$481,549
Chicago
Revenue per deal
average package price on a closed sale
$2,460
$2,616
$155
$169,167
$338,333
Dallas
Close rate
of everyone who sat down with a viewer who bought
68.4%
72.0%
3.5%
$141,820
$283,641
Boston
Revenue per deal
average package price on a closed sale
$2,461
$2,616
$155
$123,419
$246,837
Florida
Close rate
of everyone who sat down with a viewer who bought
69.9%
72.0%
2.0%
$67,037
$134,074
New York
Show rate
of everyone booked onto the calendar who actually turned up
55.6%
56.7%
1.1%
$58,696
$117,393
New York
Cash up front
share of the sale collected on the day, not financed
33.4%
35.2%
1.8%
$49,704
$99,408cash timing
Orlando
Close rate
of everyone who sat down with a viewer who bought
71.3%
72.0%
0.7%
$30,485
$60,971
New York
Booking rate
of leads that became a booking
5.6%
5.6%
0.1%
$26,069
$52,137
Chicago
Close rate
of everyone who sat down with a viewer who bought
71.5%
72.0%
0.5%
$17,441
$34,881
Nashville
Cash up front
share of the sale collected on the day, not financed
34.9%
35.2%
0.3%
$6,460
$12,920cash timing
Orlando
Cash up front
share of the sale collected on the day, not financed
35.1%
35.2%
0.1%
$2,494
$4,987cash timing
Houston
Show rate
of everyone booked onto the calendar who actually turned up
56.7%
56.7%
0.0%
$1,139
$2,277
New York
Revenue per deal
average package price on a closed sale
$2,615
$2,616
$1
$997
$1,994
TOTAL
new revenue only — cash-timing rows excluded
$3,344,073
Built from the CRM viewings, ROI and appointment feeds on Thu, 17 Sep 2026 10:33:14 GMT.