2026-03-01 → 2026-09-16 · 7 months · 8 cities · download the CSV* part-period — Sep 2026 covers 16 of 30 days
Showing months · switch to 2-week blocks — same cities, same metrics, different grain. Months are easier to read but the current one is part-finished; the 2-week blocks are all equal length.
Revenue
$22.01M
Deals
8,385
Rev / deal
$2,624
Cash up front
$7.98M
Close rate
72.2%
Bookings
19,518
Booking rate
5.6%
Show rate
56.8%
Revenue
Package price written, dated to the period the viewing fell in. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Average package price on a closed sale. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Of everyone who sat down with a viewer, the share who bought. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Share of the package price collected on the day rather than financed. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Average cash collected on the day, across sales whose package price was over $300. The $300 floor strips out the photo-only sales, which are numerous and tiny and drag a plain average down without saying anything about how the deposit was sold. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Leads that became a booking, on the lead-cohort basis. † Florida and Orlando share a pool. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Bookings as a share of leads received in that period. Lead-cohort basis, so the newest periods under-read until those leads mature. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Appointment basis: on the calendar minus no-shows and cancellations. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
KIDSX (Blue Rooms) + KX (Google) combined. † Florida and Orlando share a pool. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
KIDS leads as a share of every lead that city received in that period. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
The same nine tables as the months tab, by 2-week blocks. Separate pull, slightly different window, so the two tabs will not tie to the penny — compare the direction, not the cent.
Revenue
Package price written, dated to the period the viewing fell in. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Average package price on a closed sale. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Of everyone who sat down with a viewer, the share who bought. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Share of the package price collected on the day rather than financed. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Average cash collected on the day, across sales whose package price was over $300. The $300 floor strips out the photo-only sales, which are numerous and tiny and drag a plain average down without saying anything about how the deposit was sold. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Leads that became a booking, on the lead-cohort basis. † Florida and Orlando share a pool. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Bookings as a share of leads received in that period. Lead-cohort basis, so the newest periods under-read until those leads mature. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Appointment basis: on the calendar minus no-shows and cancellations. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
KIDSX (Blue Rooms) + KX (Google) combined. † Florida and Orlando share a pool. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
KIDS leads as a share of every lead that city received in that period. Green is that city's best period, red its worst — read across the row, not down the column. Trend compares the average of the earliest third of complete periods against the latest third, rather than first-vs-last, so one quiet period cannot swing it.
Three different bases on this page — they do not reconcile to each other, and should not. Revenue, deals, cash, close rate, viewers come from the CRM viewings feed, one row per client who sat down with a viewer. City = the studio they shot at. Settled — this is the money. Leads, bookings, booking % come from the CRM ROI feed, keyed to the day the lead arrived. City = the marketing code. Show % is the appointment basis — on the calendar minus no-shows and cancellations, keyed to the appointment date, so it is always settled. That is the same basis as the CRM's own Show Rate report. The lead-cohort show % is shown beside it in the Funnel tab and reads lower on recent months because those leads have not finished maturing. †Florida and Orlando share a lead pool. FL* codes shoot at both studios, so leads, bookings and shows are shown for the pair, not split. Revenue and deals are studio-true and stay separate.
Biggest gaps against the network median
Nashville — show rate 49.9% vs a median of 56.6%, worth about $623,221 a year Houston — booking rate 5.1% vs a median of 5.6%, worth about $569,665 a year Houston — cash up front 25.7% vs a median of 34.9%, worth about $533,138 a year
City
Revenue
Deals
Rev / deal
Cash up front
Cash on day per $300+ sale
Seen
Close %
Leads
Bookings
Booking %
KIDS leads
Show %
Rev / seen
Rev / lead
Boston
$2,138,493
860
$2,487
$744,388 34.8%
$907
1,136
75.7%
33,187
2,021
6.1%
7,074 21.3%
59.6%
$1,882
$64
Chicago
$2,927,952
1,193
$2,454
$1,096,603 37.5%
$946
1,665
71.7%
49,364
2,522
5.1%
7,926 16.1%
60.3%
$1,759
$59
Dallas
$3,042,822
1,166
$2,610
$1,349,789 44.4%
$1,217
1,720
67.8%
46,695
2,657
5.7%
6,147 13.2%
59.9%
$1,769
$65
Florida
$2,493,683
899
$2,774
$1,120,983 45.0%
$1,270
1,293
69.5%
93,189 †
5,216 †
5.6%
21,055 22.6%†
56.6%
$1,929
$63 †
Houston
$2,912,154
1,048
$2,779
$749,256 25.7%
$732
1,440
72.8%
46,364
2,346
5.1%
8,916 19.2%
56.5%
$2,022
$63
Nashville
$2,104,963
906
$2,323
$725,351 34.5%
$820
1,140
79.5%
32,501
2,071
6.4%
5,863 18.0%
49.9%
$1,846
$65
New York
$3,044,868
1,162
$2,620
$1,027,785 33.8%
$925
1,588
73.2%
49,397
2,685
5.4%
13,332 27.0%
54.8%
$1,917
$62
Orlando
$3,341,386
1,151
$2,903
$1,167,999 35.0%
$1,035
1,628
70.7%
93,189 †
5,216 †
5.6%
21,055 22.6%†
56.6%
$2,052
$63 †
TOTAL
$22,006,321
8,385
$2,624
$7,982,15336.3%
$983
11,610
72.2%
350,697
19,518
5.6%
70,31320.0%
56.8%
$1,895
$63
Lead → booked → showed
Where each city loses people between a lead arriving and someone sitting in the studio. Show % (cohort) is the lead-basis number and lags; the Showed column is the settled appointment basis. Florida and Orlando are one row — their codes cannot be split by studio.
City
Leads
Booked
On calendar
Did not show
Showed
Show % (cohort)
Lead → show %
Boston
33,187
2,021 6.1%
2,318
937 40.4%
1,381 59.6%
48.5%
3.0%
Chicago
49,364
2,522 5.1%
2,940
1,166 39.7%
1,774 60.3%
52.4%
2.7%
Dallas
46,695
2,657 5.7%
2,983
1,195 40.1%
1,788 59.9%
50.9%
2.9%
Florida + Orlando
93,189
5,216 5.6%
5,803
2,520 43.4%
3,283 56.6%
48.9%
2.7%
Houston
46,364
2,346 5.1%
2,874
1,249 43.5%
1,625 56.5%
51.2%
2.6%
Nashville
32,501
2,071 6.4%
2,529
1,267 50.1%
1,262 49.9%
40.6%
2.6%
New York
49,397
2,685 5.4%
3,164
1,429 45.2%
1,735 54.8%
46.1%
2.5%
KIDS leads received, and what they turn into
KIDS runs on two code families and both are counted here: *KIDSX is the Blue Rooms Instagram/Facebook buy, *KX is the same product on Google. They are shown split as well as combined because Orlando has no KIDSX codes at all — every Orlando kids lead arrives on KX, so a KIDSX-only count would report Orlando as having no kids business. Leads, bookings and show rate are the shared FL/ORL pool for those two cities (†); viewings, deals and revenue are studio-true.
City
KIDS leads
…KIDSX (Blue Rooms)
…KX (Google)
% of city leads
KIDS booked
KIDS show %
KIDS seen
KIDS deals
KIDS close %
KIDS revenue
KIDS rev / deal
Non-KIDS rev / deal
Boston
7,074
6,373
701
21.3%
615 8.7%
69.7%
360
280
77.8%
$733,903 34.3%
$2,621
$2,422
Chicago
7,926
6,287
1,639
16.1%
467 5.9%
71.1%
295
218
73.9%
$551,699 18.8%
$2,531
$2,437
Dallas
6,147
5,056
1,091
13.2%
555 9.0%
69.1%
390
267
68.5%
$696,187 22.9%
$2,607
$2,610
Florida
21,055 †
18,464
2,591
22.6%
1,416 6.7%
69.7%
417
297
71.2%
$829,423 33.3%
$2,793
$2,765
Houston
8,916
7,702
1,214
19.2%
625 7.0%
69.6%
343
241
70.3%
$728,199 25.0%
$3,022
$2,706
Nashville
5,863
4,708
1,155
18.0%
514 8.8%
61.3%
269
219
81.4%
$553,065 26.3%
$2,525
$2,259
New York
13,332
10,632
2,700
27.0%
854 6.4%
62.3%
473
342
72.3%
$994,019 32.6%
$2,906
$2,501
Orlando
as above
as above
as above
as above
as above
as above
413
290
70.2%
$894,502 26.8%
$3,084
$2,842
TOTAL
70,313
59,222
11,091
20.0%
5,0467.2%
2,960
2,154
72.8%
$5,980,99727.2%
$2,777
Viewers per city, and how much is worked remotely
There is no remote/in-studio flag in the CRM. This is derived: a viewer's home city is wherever they took most of their viewings over the window, so any viewing they took for a different city can only have happened on Zoom. It will understate a viewer who works remotely into their own home city.
City
Viewers
Home-based
Remote (out-of-city)
Viewings taken remotely
Revenue written remotely
Viewings / viewer
Revenue / viewer
Occasional cover
Boston
7
2
5
148 13.0%
$240,258 11.2%
162
$305,499
8
Chicago
11
4
7
419 25.2%
$740,928 25.3%
151
$266,177
7
Dallas
8
3
5
69 4.0%
$103,732 3.4%
215
$380,353
3
Florida
13
5
8
173 13.4%
$311,690 12.5%
99
$191,822
3
Houston
4
2
2
23 1.6%
$15,950 0.5%
360
$728,039
2
Nashville
10
1
9
380 33.3%
$684,198 32.5%
114
$210,496
3
New York
8
4
4
78 4.9%
$100,300 3.3%
199
$380,609
5
Orlando
10
2
8
685 42.1%
$1,272,656 38.1%
163
$334,139
4
Every viewer, by city worked
A viewer who works more than one city appears once per city. Rank colours only apply where they saw 20+ clients. Cash / sale ($300+ sales) is the average taken on the day across sales over $300 — it strips out the sub-$300 photo-only sales that drag a plain average down. Took $300+ up front counts the sales where the deposit itself reached $300, which is the deposit-quality read rather than the deal-size one.
Viewer
Working for
Home city
Seen
Sold
Close %
Revenue
Rev / deal
Cash up front
Cash / sale $300+ sales
Took $300+ up front
Audra T
Orlando
Orlando
864
631
73.0%
$1,930,780
$3,060
$660,107 34.2%
$1,060
498 78.9%
Angela K
Houston
Houston
783
645
82.4%
$1,825,175
$2,830
$412,935 22.6%
$662
461 71.5%
Elly R
Dallas
Dallas
872
649
74.4%
$1,579,459
$2,434
$623,848 39.5%
$1,000
472 72.7%
Terri M
Florida
Florida
691
514
74.4%
$1,461,978
$2,844
$668,438 45.7%
$1,312
454 88.3%
Liz G
Nashville
Nashville
760
623
82.0%
$1,420,765
$2,281
$467,106 32.9%
$759
379 60.8%
Samuel G
Chicago
Chicago
797
580
72.8%
$1,408,024
$2,428
$584,495 41.5%
$1,012
441 76.0%
Debra W
New York
New York
715
533
74.5%
$1,225,175
$2,299
$484,900 39.6%
$979
387 72.6%
Josie R
New York
New York
489
344
70.3%
$1,135,423
$3,301
$334,465 29.5%
$975
304 88.4%
Dawn B
Houston
Houston
634
393
62.0%
$1,071,029
$2,725
$330,971 30.9%
$846
322 81.9%
Naomi W
Boston
Boston
406
316
77.8%
$952,060
$3,013
$244,649 25.7%
$799
250 79.1%
Jodi S
Boston
Boston
578
445
77.0%
$941,375
$2,115
$381,743 40.6%
$915
356 80.0%
Kriss A
Florida
Florida
402
254
63.2%
$689,240
$2,714
$310,619 45.1%
$1,259
217 85.4%
Rachel S
Dallas
Dallas
442
254
57.5%
$688,127
$2,709
$367,847 53.5%
$1,500
220 86.6%
Lauren B
Dallas
Dallas
333
217
65.2%
$667,854
$3,078
$333,434 49.9%
$1,668
173 79.7%
Kriss A
Orlando remote
Florida
298
179
60.1%
$503,200
$2,811
$216,562 43.0%
$1,247
143 79.9%
Alex V
Orlando remote
New York
213
157
73.7%
$424,800
$2,706
$119,625 28.2%
$770
130 82.8%
Megan B
Chicago
Chicago
271
190
70.1%
$419,330
$2,207
$103,581 24.7%
$594
138 72.6%
Alex V
New York
New York
214
170
79.4%
$409,070
$2,406
$129,520 31.7%
$780
138 81.2%
Fabio Como
Chicago
Chicago
165
132
80.0%
$351,270
$2,661
$113,715 32.4%
$873
108 81.8%
Lauren B
Chicago remote
Dallas
165
116
70.3%
$348,350
$3,003
$170,148 48.8%
$1,552
91 78.4%
Alex V
Chicago remote
New York
120
94
78.3%
$227,400
$2,419
$73,860 32.5%
$793
78 83.0%
Alex V
Nashville remote
New York
119
93
78.2%
$212,300
$2,283
$63,149 29.7%
$699
66 71.0%
Tiffany L
New York
New York
91
73
80.2%
$174,900
$2,396
$51,270 29.3%
$766
53 72.6%
Rachel S
Nashville remote
Dallas
71
53
74.6%
$151,925
$2,867
$92,625 61.0%
$1,810
47 88.7%
Mackenzie C
Orlando
Orlando
79
61
77.2%
$137,950
$2,261
$31,807 23.1%
$540
40 65.6%
Lauren B
Florida remote
Dallas
50
36
72.0%
$110,275
$3,063
$45,115 40.9%
$1,363
28 77.8%
Lauren B
Boston remote
Dallas
44
35
79.5%
$94,850
$2,710
$51,045 53.8%
$1,458
28 80.0%
Fabio Como
Orlando remote
Chicago
44
33
75.0%
$93,810
$2,843
$39,670 42.3%
$1,202
26 78.8%
Lauren B
Orlando remote
Dallas
31
28
90.3%
$89,455
$3,195
$38,374 42.9%
$1,472
20 71.4%
Naomi W
Orlando remote
Boston
47
30
63.8%
$88,566
$2,952
$25,049 28.3%
$922
25 83.3%
Naomi W
Nashville remote
Boston
32
27
84.4%
$78,078
$2,892
$15,421 19.8%
$588
18 66.7%
Jodi S
Nashville remote
Boston
52
37
71.2%
$73,800
$1,995
$33,725 45.7%
$1,010
28 75.7%
Lauren B
Nashville remote
Dallas
37
29
78.4%
$71,345
$2,460
$22,095 31.0%
$866
19 65.5%
Kriss A
Boston remote
Florida
38
22
57.9%
$61,450
$2,793
$27,500 44.8%
$1,250
16 72.7%
Mackenzie C
Dallas remote
Orlando
31
25
80.6%
$58,900
$2,356
$14,228 24.2%
$639
19 76.0%
Fabio Como
Florida remote
Chicago
27
20
74.1%
$57,184
$2,859
$22,870 40.0%
$1,144
18 90.0%
Mackenzie C
New York remote
Orlando
31
21
67.7%
$55,400
$2,638
$13,040 23.5%
$648
16 76.2%
Mackenzie C
Chicago remote
Orlando
33
21
63.6%
$53,200
$2,533
$9,045 17.0%
$470
14 66.7%
Kriss A
Chicago remote
Florida
54
26
48.1%
$52,650
$2,025
$25,650 48.7%
$1,060
14 53.8%
Alex V
Boston remote
New York
29
22
75.9%
$50,940
$2,315
$20,590 40.4%
$936
19 86.4%
Rachel S
Florida remote
Dallas
25
16
64.0%
$45,450
$2,841
$31,090 68.4%
$1,943
14 87.5%
Kriss A
Nashville remote
Florida
28
21
75.0%
$44,925
$2,139
$15,075 33.6%
$789
12 57.1%
Rachel S
Orlando remote
Dallas
23
17
73.9%
$41,275
$2,428
$30,715 74.4%
$1,807
15 88.2%
Naomi W
Chicago remote
Boston
20
15
75.0%
$35,527
$2,368
$10,004 28.2%
$693
11 73.3%
Elly R
Orlando remote
Dallas
16
15
93.8%
$31,550
$2,103
$6,090 19.3%
$406
9 60.0%
Josie R
Florida remote
New York
19
9
47.4%
$29,399
$3,267
$15,599 53.1%
$1,733
8 88.9%
Naomi W
Florida remote
Boston
18
11
61.1%
$28,682
$2,607
$5,482 19.1%
$543
7 63.6%
Fabio Como
Nashville remote
Chicago
13
9
69.2%
$26,475
$2,942
$5,525 20.9%
$614
9 100.0%
Kriss A
New York remote
Florida
23
11
47.8%
$26,000
$2,364
$9,475 36.4%
$861
9 81.8%
Rachel S
Boston remote
Dallas
20
10
50.0%
$25,218
$2,522
$13,391 53.1%
$1,488
9 90.0%
Mackenzie C
Nashville remote
Orlando
18
13
72.2%
$21,300
$1,638
$6,580 30.9%
$506
9 69.2%
Bee Keskin
Florida
Florida
9
8
88.9%
$18,425
$2,303
$7,315 39.7%
$914
6 75.0%
Kriss A
Dallas remote
Florida
10
7
70.0%
$18,000
$2,571
$4,300 23.9%
$717
6 85.7%
Mackenzie C
Florida remote
Orlando
17
13
76.5%
$17,000
$1,308
$5,450 32.1%
$433
10 76.9%
Megan B
Florida remote
Chicago
10
6
60.0%
$17,000
$2,833
$3,100 18.2%
$517
6 100.0%
Alex V
Houston remote
New York
16
9
56.3%
$15,350
$1,706
$5,200 33.9%
$650
5 55.6%
Naomi W
Dallas remote
Boston
11
6
54.5%
$13,532
$2,255
$2,982 22.0%
$576
4 66.7%
Lauren B
New York remote
Dallas
10
5
50.0%
$12,650
$2,530
$2,500 19.8%
$588
4 80.0%
Lee F
Florida
Florida
9
4
44.4%
$11,550
$2,888
$3,000 26.0%
$750
2 50.0%
Jodi S
Chicago remote
Boston
10
6
60.0%
$10,600
$1,767
$2,725 25.7%
$454
5 83.3%
Alex V
Dallas remote
New York
7
4
57.1%
$9,900
$2,475
$1,850 18.7%
$463
3 75.0%
Angela K
Chicago remote
Houston
10
3
30.0%
$8,800
$2,933
$1,030 11.7%
$343
2 66.7%
Tequila Williams
Chicago
Chicago
9
7
77.8%
$8,400
$1,200
$1,500 17.9%
$214
3 42.9%
Mackenzie C
Boston remote
Orlando
7
5
71.4%
$7,000
$1,400
$3,430 49.0%
$686
5 100.0%
Alex V
Florida remote
New York
5
4
80.0%
$4,800
$1,200
$2,150 44.8%
$538
4 100.0%
Rachel S
New York remote
Dallas
7
2
28.6%
$1,950
$975
$600 30.8%
$300
1 50.0%
Kriss A
Houston remote
Florida
5
1
20.0%
$600
$600
$150 25.0%
$150
0 0.0%
Natalia Granado
Florida
Florida
6
0
0.0%
$0
—
$0 —
—
0 —
Natalia Granado
Dallas remote
Florida
5
0
0.0%
$0
—
$0 —
—
0 —
Lee F
Nashville remote
Florida
6
0
0.0%
$0
—
$0 —
—
0 —
Natalia Granado
Orlando remote
Florida
6
0
0.0%
$0
—
$0 —
—
0 —
35 viewer/city pairs with fewer than 5 viewings are not listed (one-off cover). Their viewings and revenue ARE included in every total above.
Where the money is
Every city/metric pair sitting below the network median, priced at what closing the gap to median would be worth. Held at the city's own deal size and close rate — no assumption that a weak city suddenly sells like the best one. Sorted by annual value.
City
What is below the network median
This city
Network median
Gap
Worth (6 mths)
Worth / year
Nashville
Show rate
of everyone booked onto the calendar who actually turned up
49.9%
56.6%
6.7%
$311,611
$623,221
Houston
Booking rate
of leads that became a booking
5.1%
5.6%
0.5%
$284,832
$569,665
Houston
Cash up front
share of the sale collected on the day, not financed
25.7%
34.9%
9.2%
$266,569
$533,138cash timing
Nashville
Revenue per deal
average package price on a closed sale
$2,323
$2,615
$292
$264,224
$528,447
Chicago
Booking rate
of leads that became a booking
5.1%
5.6%
0.5%
$255,741
$511,482
Dallas
Close rate
of everyone who sat down with a viewer who bought
67.8%
72.2%
4.4%
$198,574
$397,149
Chicago
Revenue per deal
average package price on a closed sale
$2,454
$2,615
$161
$191,739
$383,477
Boston
Revenue per deal
average package price on a closed sale
$2,487
$2,615
$128
$110,404
$220,809
New York
Show rate
of everyone booked onto the calendar who actually turned up
54.8%
56.6%
1.7%
$105,472
$210,944
Florida
Close rate
of everyone who sat down with a viewer who bought
69.5%
72.2%
2.7%
$96,353
$192,706
New York
Booking rate
of leads that became a booking
5.4%
5.6%
0.2%
$83,970
$167,939
Orlando
Close rate
of everyone who sat down with a viewer who bought
70.7%
72.2%
1.5%
$71,576
$143,152
New York
Cash up front
share of the sale collected on the day, not financed
33.8%
34.9%
1.1%
$34,334
$68,667cash timing
Chicago
Close rate
of everyone who sat down with a viewer who bought
71.7%
72.2%
0.6%
$23,009
$46,018
Nashville
Cash up front
share of the sale collected on the day, not financed
34.5%
34.9%
0.4%
$8,908
$17,815cash timing
Dallas
Revenue per deal
average package price on a closed sale
$2,610
$2,615
$5
$6,264
$12,527
Houston
Show rate
of everyone booked onto the calendar who actually turned up
56.5%
56.6%
0.0%
$1,905
$3,810
Boston
Cash up front
share of the sale collected on the day, not financed
34.8%
34.9%
0.1%
$1,567
$3,134cash timing
TOTAL
new revenue only — cash-timing rows excluded
$4,011,347
Built from the CRM viewings, ROI and appointment feeds on Thu, 17 Sep 2026 10:34:26 GMT.